Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: Study: Exotic Names Don't Make Grade For Black Students  (Read 2827 times)

Statistic

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 10080
  • I never had a chance
    • View Profile
Re: Study: Exotic Names Don't Make Grade For Black Students
« Reply #10 on: May 15, 2005, 11:32:22 AM »
we do realize that poorer blacks are more likely to name their kids Bonesheequa and richer ones are more likely to name their kids Stephanie, right?
Look to the left -- Look to the right

Lawprofessor

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 3376
  • Pony Up!
    • View Profile
Re: Study: Exotic Names Don't Make Grade For Black Students
« Reply #11 on: May 15, 2005, 12:04:08 PM »
we do realize that poorer blacks are more likely to name their kids Bonesheequa and richer ones are more likely to name their kids Stephanie, right?

Pretty much yeah....nuff said!
Back in the saddle again.

dbgirl

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 5091
    • View Profile
    • KnowTheTruth
Re: Study: Exotic Names Don't Make Grade For Black Students
« Reply #12 on: May 15, 2005, 02:37:26 PM »
I think there is a difference between African names and African American names like Bonesheequa.
An African name, IMO is honoring your heritage. Names like Bonesheequa, that's just something someone made up for a sound effect.
When you have somebody dying because they are poor and black or poor and white or because of whatever they are ... that erases everything that's great about this country.

-TMcGraw

http://www.wm3.org/splash.php

HBCU.EDU

  • Guest
Re: Study: Exotic Names Don't Make Grade For Black Students
« Reply #13 on: May 15, 2005, 03:01:45 PM »
we do realize that poorer blacks are more likely to name their kids Bonesheequa and richer ones are more likely to name their kids Stephanie, right?

I think that is obvious. I don't know why they don't get it. There is nothing really to talk about. 

official2008

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 174
  • London Jazz Cafe
    • Yahoo Instant Messenger - official2007
    • View Profile
    • LSN PROFILE
Re: Study: Exotic Names Don't Make Grade For Black Students
« Reply #14 on: May 15, 2005, 03:04:34 PM »
i remember a similar study i heard about a while ago...


this one has nothing to do with the socio-economic status of parents; this is pure racism. check it out


December 12, 2002
What's in a Name? Perhaps Plenty if You're a Job Seeker
By ALAN B. KRUEGER

 
HAT'S in a name? Evidently plenty if you are looking for a job.

To test whether employers discriminate against black job applicants, Marianne Bertrand of the University of Chicago and Sendhil Mullainathan of M.I.T. conducted an unusual experiment. They selected 1,300 help-wanted ads from newspapers in Boston and Chicago and submitted multiple résumés from phantom job seekers. The researchers randomly assigned the first names on the résumés, choosing from one set that is particularly common among blacks and from another that is common among whites.

So Kristen and Tamika, and Brad and Tyrone, applied for jobs from the same pool of want ads and had equivalent résumés. Nine names were selected to represent each category: black women, white women, black men and white men. Last names common to the racial group were also assigned. Four résumés were typically submitted for each job opening, drawn from a reservoir of 160. Nearly 5,000 applications were submitted from mid-2001 to mid-2002. Professors Bertrand and Mullainathan kept track of which candidates were invited for job interviews.

No single employer was sent two identical résumés, and the names on the résumés were randomly assigned, so applicants with black- and white-sounding names applied for the same set of jobs with the same set of résumés.

Apart from their names, applicants had the same experience, education and skills, so employers had no reason to distinguish among them.

The results are disturbing. Applicants with white-sounding names were 50 percent more likely to be called for interviews than were those with black-sounding names. Interviews were requested for 10.1 percent of applicants with white-sounding names and only 6.7 percent of those with black-sounding names.

Within racial groups, applications with men's or women's names were equally likely to result in calls for interviews, providing little evidence of discrimination based on sex in these entry-level jobs.

There were significant differences in interview-request rates among the nine names associated with black women, but not among the names within each of the other groups.

At the low end, the interview-request rate was 2.2 percent for Aisha, 3.8 percent for Keisha and 5.4 percent for Tamika, compared with 9.1 percent for Kenya and Latonya and 10.5 percent for Ebony.

Only part of this variability reflects chance differences resulting from sampling, although the authors have not been able to find a good explanation for the wide range. Thus it is important that the names chosen for black women were not uncommon; they represent 7.1 percent of all names listed on Massachusetts birth certificates for black girls from 1974 to 1979.

The 50 percent advantage in interview requests for white-sounding names held in both Boston and Chicago, and for both men and women.

This discrepancy complements findings from earlier studies in which researchers sent a small number of matched black and white "auditors" to apply for jobs in person. Typically, though not always, the black job seekers were less likely to be invited for an interview or offered a job.

Those findings, however, were criticized because the applicants knew the intention of the study and might have behaved differently. In addition, the auditors might not have been well matched with the jobs in question; they could have been overqualified or underqualified.

Professors Bertrand and Mullainathan's study is less susceptible to these concerns. First, they used a large number of names and inanimate résumés. Second, the job openings involved administrative, sales, clerical and managerial positions, and they submitted résumés patterned after real résumés of people who were actually seeking similar jobs.

Their most alarming finding is that the likelihood of being called for an interview rises sharply with an applicant's credentials — like experience and honors — for those with white-sounding names, but much less for those with black-sounding names. A grave concern is that this phenomenon may be damping the incentives for blacks to acquire job skills, producing a self-fulfilling prophecy that perpetuates prejudice and misallocates resources.

Two main theories explain labor market discrimination. One, known as taste-based discrimination, posits that employers — or customers, co-workers or supervisors — have a preference against hiring minority applicants, even if they know they are equally productive.

The other, known as statistical discrimination, assumes that employers personally harbor no racial animus but cannot perfectly predict workers' productivity. In this case, an employer assessing an applicant would assign some weight to the average performance of the person's racial group, instead of basing the judgment solely on the individual's merits.

A difference between these models is that employers sacrifice profits to indulge in taste-based discrimination, while, in principle, statistical discrimination, if based on accurate information, can help the bottom line. Professors Bertrand and Mullainathan cannot distinguish between the models — and both may be applicable — but they suspect that their finding that employers in heavily black areas of Chicago are less likely to discriminate against black-sounding names augurs for taste-based discrimination.

Nevertheless, either rationale for discrimination is illegal and prohibited.

"That which we call a rose," Juliet said, "by any other name would smell as sweet." An organization like the Civil Rights Commission or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission could perform a service if it routinely monitored discrimination by conducting audit studies similar to Professors Bertrand and Mullainathan's.




Give is us free!

_BP_

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2594
  • Think. Wait. Fast.
    • View Profile
Re: Study: Exotic Names Don't Make Grade For Black Students
« Reply #15 on: May 15, 2005, 04:00:38 PM »
we do realize that poorer blacks are more likely to name their kids Bonesheequa and richer ones are more likely to name their kids Stephanie, right?

I think that is obvious. I don't know why they don't get it. There is nothing really to talk about. 

Exactly.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
1776 TO 2006

Made4law

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 547
  • "to boldly go, where no man has gone before"
    • View Profile
Re: Study: Exotic Names Don't Make Grade For Black Students
« Reply #16 on: May 15, 2005, 04:15:27 PM »
Obama needs to resign his Senate seat right now!!!! Didn't he know he was stupid, he's lived his whole life with that name...I heard Harvard is going to strip him of his Law Review EIC title, now that this article is out... >:(
"Ambition is a poor excuse for not having enough sense to be lazy."

HBCU.EDU

  • Guest
Re: Study: Exotic Names Don't Make Grade For Black Students
« Reply #17 on: May 15, 2005, 04:16:42 PM »
Obama needs to resign his Senate seat right now!!!! Didn't he know he was stupid, he's lived his whole life with that name...I heard Harvard is going to strip him of his Law Review EIC title, now that this article is out... >:(

 :D

hilljack

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1669
    • View Profile
Re: Study: Exotic Names Don't Make Grade For Black Students
« Reply #18 on: May 15, 2005, 04:20:23 PM »
Ted Kennedy tried to change his name to Osama.

But I agree with the poster who said that the names are indicative of the social/economic status of the parents.  The two black kids from my high school who went to college: one had a traditional name and middle class parents and the other had a traditional African name and middle class parents.  He was actually African.

_BP_

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 2594
  • Think. Wait. Fast.
    • View Profile
Re: Study: Exotic Names Don't Make Grade For Black Students
« Reply #19 on: May 15, 2005, 04:32:57 PM »
Obama needs to resign his Senate seat right now!!!! Didn't he know he was stupid, he's lived his whole life with that name...I heard Harvard is going to strip him of his Law Review EIC title, now that this article is out... >:(

Well Obama is not the descendant of American slaves, so he's not black.  This article obviously does not apply to him!  ;)  :D

hahha, just messing.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
1776 TO 2006