To add to the discussion, an article I found that said that anyone can be victim of hate crimes the same percent. white or black.
"THE UNLIKELIHOOD OF RACE CRIME SEEN IN FBI STATISTICS
An Important Message By An Anonymous Contributor to the ACRR Mailbox ...
The number of hate crimes per capita in the USA is so low that it begs the question, "Why is there the belief that hate crimes are frequent when actually they are very rare?" The Associate Press ran an article today on FBI statistics for hate crimes, demonstrating that only 4,831 hate crimes were reported having allegedly occured by whites against blacks in the entire nation. Some of these complaints may have been frivolous. The article does not examine the status of the complain nor its outcome.
If we take the entire number of 4,831 hate crimes as the "real" number, we can see that out of 180 million white Americans coming up to a black person on the street, only 1 out of 37,250 persons would be guilty of attempting a hate crime. Of course, the hate crime may have occured only once in the 365 day year or 37,250*365=13,596,000 persons. In other words, a black person would have to pass 13,596,000 white persons before being the victim of a hate crime on any given day.
The blacks are guilty of committing 1,226 hate crimes against whites. Of the 30,000,000 blacks in America, this is about one hate crime committed per 24,469 persons or per year one could pass 8,931,000 blacks before becoming the victim of a hate crime. This is slightly fewer persons than for whites, but nonetheless it is still a very minute hazard.
The question then, is why do we find so many NEWS stories about hate crimes? Perhaps the answer is found in politics and propaganda. There must be persons in the United States, such as groups who receive money for civil rights, human rights, and crime watches who can fund-raise better when people believe that prejudice and hate crimes are predominate.
When we remember the church burning fiasco in which it took six months for the FBI to find a single KKK associate to pin a fire upon and hundreds of black teenagers and ministers setting fires to their churches, we begin to see the desperation in this type of anti-white hatred and viciousness, because that is what white-baiting-hatred-stories like these are all about. Never forget also that President Clinton's 1996 DNC Acceptance Speech contained a lie about whites having placed swastikas on the doors of black soldiers at Fort Bragg's 82nd Airbourne facilities. Mr. Clinton knew full well that a black man had painted those swastikas on those doors in order to implicate white men unfairly, yet the NEWS media nationwide failed to mention this mistake. Had this mistake been made by a Republican, it would have been on page one.
The press wants the public to believe in the fiction of white racial violence, when, as a matter of fact, there is slightly more likelihood that a black hate crime against whites is performed per capita than vice versa. In addition, the number of hate crimes is miniscule. The likelihood of one happening to anyone is less than the likelihood of winning the lottery.
So, where's the hate? What's the fuss?
11/04/96, USA TODAY"