My biggest thing in LR tends to be getting tripped up with conditional reasoning and the sufficient/necessary thing. I know the concepts backwards and forwards, and am fine applying it in LG, but sometimes I spend time setting up the sufficient/necessary/logic conditions in LR and it ends up that I don't have to. Or questions where you really *should* set it up, I get tripped up in the wording.These types of questions seem to be not as prevalent in the new tests, I don't think, but then again, I could just not be seeing where logical reasoning comes into play. Anyone else get tripped up like this?
you do realize that it's near impossible to tell when you're joking and when you're being serious, right?Quote from: guyutegirl (Jew-Lo) on June 03, 2004, 06:23:39 PMI like all sections of the LSAT. not only is the content interesting, but it keeps my mental skills sharp and refined.
I like all sections of the LSAT. not only is the content interesting, but it keeps my mental skills sharp and refined.