While Jews only constitute 2% of America's population, they make up 20% - 30% of all Ivey League and top tier institutions. The fact that they do not have a check box for their Semitic race forces them to check white. This hides their extreme overepresenation, and vastly exagerrates the actual caucausian enrollment numbers. Alas, this change is unlikely to happen, since anyone who points out unflattering facts about Jews is labelled an anti-Semite, which is the most damning term in our society.
Quote from: my ninja on April 29, 2005, 12:45:34 PMWhile Jews only constitute 2% of America's population, they make up 20% - 30% of all Ivey League and top tier institutions. The fact that they do not have a check box for their Semitic race forces them to check white. This hides their extreme overepresenation, and vastly exagerrates the actual caucausian enrollment numbers. Alas, this change is unlikely to happen, since anyone who points out unflattering facts about Jews is labelled an anti-Semite, which is the most damning term in our society.What's unflattering about making it into the upper echelons of society?
there's really nothing wrong with what this fella's saying. picture vietnamese folk (im not vietnamese, so no bias here); asians would be considered overrepresented in law school and as attorneys; however, this broad category does nothing to note that different groups gain admission at different rates; chinese/japanese americans enter law at much higher rates than vietnamese, cambodians, and laotians; and yet these individuals are lumped into the 'asian' category, and thus labeled as overrepresented; true, some schools make exceptions and consider them URM, but this is not the consensus. in short, if what the OP is saying is true, then dropping jews into the 'white' category distorts representational counts; as to whether somthing should be done about this.. well that's a different story, all im saying is that numbers are numbers, and unless you break them down properly, numbers are certainly capable of lying.