Law School Discussion

Conversion for Test #31

MindTheGap76

  • ****
  • 1794
  • UChicago Alum ('08)
    • View Profile
    • Email
Conversion for Test #31
« on: May 31, 2004, 06:04:05 PM »
I just took LSAT #31, but don't have a score conversion chart for it.  Could anyone tell me how a raw score of 93 converts?

Thanks.

nathanielmark

Re: Conversion for Test #31
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2004, 06:46:41 PM »
173 nicely done.

MindTheGap76

  • ****
  • 1794
  • UChicago Alum ('08)
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Conversion for Test #31
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2004, 06:52:16 PM »
Bah, the games section killed me on that one.  I took test 28 last night and got a 179 on it, now I'm back down in the < 175 range.

Thanks for the hookup on the score GreenEqsnHam.

M2

Re: Conversion for Test #31
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2004, 06:59:38 PM »
Bah, the games section killed me on that one.  I took test 28 last night and got a 179 on it, now I'm back down in the < 175 range.

Thanks for the hookup on the score GreenEqsnHam.

Back down to the 175 range...lol
ohh how horrible...

Congrats on the great scores.

MindTheGap76

  • ****
  • 1794
  • UChicago Alum ('08)
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Conversion for Test #31
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2004, 07:09:28 PM »
Hahaha... sorry, its not the score itself that upsets me, its the complete inconsistency.  I have scored everywhere between a 180 and a 168 on my practice tests.  I thought with more practice tests, I would get a better feel for how I was going to do on the real deal, but so far there doesn't seem to be any pattern.

Also, just as a warning, I don't have conversion charts for test 32 or 33 either, so I may be bugging you guys again in the near future :)

nathanielmark

Re: Conversion for Test #31
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2004, 07:19:47 PM »
i definitely share your frustration with the inconsistency of scoring.  my scores have been between 164-172 in recent weeks, with no upward or downward progression.

i think everyone goes thru it.  it sucks, but thats life i guess.

M2

Re: Conversion for Test #31
« Reply #6 on: May 31, 2004, 07:21:42 PM »
just giving ya a hard time because I was complaining to someone about being stuck around 168...and then I foudn out they they were stuck around 149...
..we all have our ranges.