Law School Discussion

College Football

LittleRussianPrincess, Esq.

  • ****
  • 1986
  • Hopelessly devoted...to the Tennessee Vols!
    • View Profile
Re: College Football
« Reply #460 on: September 04, 2005, 11:20:50 AM »
close means nothing the bcs asswh*les. then again, i'm sure we could win it all and still see some random bowl in podunk, idaho on christmas.

that's because the stregth of schedule is no longer a bcs factor. 

that's why auburn got screwed last year. 

TrojanChispas

  • ****
  • 4667
  • , a worthy adversary
    • View Profile
Re: College Football
« Reply #461 on: September 04, 2005, 11:21:22 AM »
it is clearly college football season, and this is clearly the college football thread.  No reasonable person could find in Blue Warrior's favor, therefore I grant summary judgement against BW and dismiss his ludicrous claims.

*slams gavel*

as you were

supergirluw

Re: College Football
« Reply #462 on: September 04, 2005, 11:30:49 AM »
only for the purposes of this thread. for all my purposes, U$C is just rich and lucky.

supergirluw

Re: College Football
« Reply #463 on: September 04, 2005, 11:36:20 AM »
compared to the rest of the PAC-10? They monetarily dominate the conference, and when it comes to decisive things like quality of players and coaching staff, it matters. Sure, compared to texas and football-heavy conferences they aren't giants, but versus the rest of "us"...it affects the game.

TrojanChispas

  • ****
  • 4667
  • , a worthy adversary
    • View Profile
Re: College Football
« Reply #464 on: September 04, 2005, 11:41:06 AM »
Reggie Bush is diseased.  He does something ill everytime he touches the football.

supergirluw

Re: College Football
« Reply #465 on: September 04, 2005, 11:48:18 AM »
compared to the rest of the PAC-10? They monetarily dominate the conference, and when it comes to decisive things like quality of players and coaching staff, it matters. Sure, compared to texas and football-heavy conferences they aren't giants, but versus the rest of "us"...it affects the game.

Well, start donating :P

The Pac 10 sucks, too.  Just so ya know :).

haha you're SO FUNNY! lol  :P it would be fun to be in a conference where football was strong....

be10dwn

Re: College Football
« Reply #466 on: September 04, 2005, 11:48:57 AM »
um, my Razorbacks won yesterday. OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHH HHHHHHHHHHHHHHH PIG SOOOOOOOOOEY

TrojanChispas

  • ****
  • 4667
  • , a worthy adversary
    • View Profile
Re: College Football
« Reply #467 on: September 04, 2005, 12:00:56 PM »
See you in two weeks ;)

TrojanChispas

  • ****
  • 4667
  • , a worthy adversary
    • View Profile
Re: College Football
« Reply #468 on: September 04, 2005, 12:02:02 PM »
compared to the rest of the PAC-10? They monetarily dominate the conference, and when it comes to decisive things like quality of players and coaching staff, it matters. Sure, compared to texas and football-heavy conferences they aren't giants, but versus the rest of "us"...it affects the game.

Well, start donating :P

The Pac 10 sucks, too.  Just so ya know :).

haha you're SO FUNNY! lol  :P it would be fun to be in a conference where football was strong....
or if your team could dominate their own, regardless of strength. uhh wait... nm  ;D

supergirluw

Re: College Football
« Reply #469 on: September 04, 2005, 12:08:24 PM »
hmph.