Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: College Football  (Read 199945 times)

jer

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 16596
  • i likes gold chapstick
    • View Profile
Re: College Football
« Reply #3510 on: December 04, 2006, 02:37:58 PM »
yeah, it's like cal had two separate teams showing up for the two halves of the season

jer

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 16596
  • i likes gold chapstick
    • View Profile
Re: College Football
« Reply #3511 on: December 04, 2006, 02:50:02 PM »
yeah, it's like cal had two separate teams showing up for the two halves of the season

SRSLY.

So are we going with the change 'tar and caption for 7 days bet?

i'd go crazy not being able to switch my 'tar for 7 days....
my precious 'tars....

but i'm up for it,
i can always blame fran if they lose

jer

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 16596
  • i likes gold chapstick
    • View Profile
Re: College Football
« Reply #3512 on: December 04, 2006, 02:54:54 PM »
yeah, it's like cal had two separate teams showing up for the two halves of the season

SRSLY.

So are we going with the change 'tar and caption for 7 days bet?

i'd go crazy not being able to switch my 'tar for 7 days....
my precious 'tars....

but i'm up for it,
i can always blame fran if they lose

how about 7 different tars for 7 different days?

how about just unlimited 'tar control for a week?

jer

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 16596
  • i likes gold chapstick
    • View Profile
Re: College Football
« Reply #3513 on: December 04, 2006, 04:02:04 PM »
yeah, it's like cal had two separate teams showing up for the two halves of the season

SRSLY.

So are we going with the change 'tar and caption for 7 days bet?

i'd go crazy not being able to switch my 'tar for 7 days....
my precious 'tars....

but i'm up for it,
i can always blame fran if they lose

how about 7 different tars for 7 different days?

how about just unlimited 'tar control for a week?

sounds good.

sounds like a fun week, either way

Ever

  • Guest
Re: College Football
« Reply #3514 on: December 04, 2006, 04:09:47 PM »
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=2686073


 :-\ Callahan doesn't need to do this; they played well.

TrojanChispas

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4702
  • , a worthy adversary
    • View Profile
Re: College Football
« Reply #3515 on: December 04, 2006, 05:43:04 PM »
from what i saw, the computer rankings have uf and um dead equal at like .940

but, uf overtook um in the last two weeks in the human polls, mainly because um hasn't played and uf did

if ohio is favored by more than 3 over uf, then how can they be the #2 team above um?



You are a total homer if you think that the spread should have a bearing on college football rankings.

HTH
Arab Majority May Not Stay Forever Silent
http://www.nysun.com/article/36110?page_no=1

TrojanChispas

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4702
  • , a worthy adversary
    • View Profile
Re: College Football
« Reply #3516 on: December 04, 2006, 05:46:21 PM »
i'm gonna have to check with cal and see how he'd like to wager a new 'tar for the holiday bowl

21 vs 22 is a good matchup

I have a feeling the holiday bowl will be a blowout. Either Cal will play the way they have for the past ~5 weeks, and get blown out. Or they'll play like a top-10 team (like they did for a few weeks) and blow out A&M. I'm down for a bet, either way.


Oh, and how much does our loss against Arizona hurt right now...with SC's loss, we could have been going to the granddaddy of them all. Oh well, I'm happy with our share of the pac-10 title and the axe.

You dont have a share of the Pac-10 title
Arab Majority May Not Stay Forever Silent
http://www.nysun.com/article/36110?page_no=1

jer

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 16596
  • i likes gold chapstick
    • View Profile
Re: College Football
« Reply #3517 on: December 04, 2006, 05:58:12 PM »
from what i saw, the computer rankings have uf and um dead equal at like .940

but, uf overtook um in the last two weeks in the human polls, mainly because um hasn't played and uf did

if ohio is favored by more than 3 over uf, then how can they be the #2 team above um?



You are a total homer if you think that the spread should have a bearing on college football rankings.

HTH


what i'm saying is the #1 team should play the #2 team.

the #1 team shouldn't play the #3 team because it's only fair they get a shot.

ohio beat um by 3

if ohio is a 2 td favorite over florida,
that shows people don't really think that uf is better than um,
so um should be #2


TrojanChispas

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 4702
  • , a worthy adversary
    • View Profile
Re: College Football
« Reply #3518 on: December 04, 2006, 06:01:07 PM »
http://www.pac-10.org/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/120406aag.html

co-champions.

That's total bs.  USC beat Cal and thus is the better team and shouldnt have to share the title with a lesser team.
Arab Majority May Not Stay Forever Silent
http://www.nysun.com/article/36110?page_no=1

jer

  • LSD Obsessed
  • *****
  • Posts: 16596
  • i likes gold chapstick
    • View Profile
Re: College Football
« Reply #3519 on: December 04, 2006, 06:06:06 PM »
http://www.pac-10.org/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/120406aag.html

co-champions.

That's total bs.  USC beat Cal and thus is the better team and shouldnt have to share the title with a lesser team.

using your logic....ucla and oregon state beat usc, and thus are the better team and should be ranked higher than usc?