Quote from: MC on May 05, 2005, 04:51:01 PMQuote from: davisxa on May 05, 2005, 06:53:06 AMStanford (the school that brought us Condy Rice, thanks) actually has a reputation for producing some of the most conservative lawyers and academics, followed by University of Chicago. Is this true? Yes, definitely. I think you also really have to look at the faculty, as the faculty sort of guide the direction of scholarship. (In that regard, Stanford & Univ. of Chicago are conservative) We should include UCLA; they have a fantastic CRT focus and they have Kimberle Crenshaw. I don't think "public interest" should be politics-nuetral. We are talking about serving the under-represented, those without access to resources and a voice, and that IS political.
Quote from: davisxa on May 05, 2005, 06:53:06 AMStanford (the school that brought us Condy Rice, thanks) actually has a reputation for producing some of the most conservative lawyers and academics, followed by University of Chicago. Is this true?
Stanford (the school that brought us Condy Rice, thanks) actually has a reputation for producing some of the most conservative lawyers and academics, followed by University of Chicago.
Next to Michigan you can add (from their web-site):The University of Michigan was recognized in 2001 as the Public Interest School of the Year by the student division of the ABA.Don't know who the recent winners have been...
I'd go more off of the feel when you visit. And when I visited it felt impossible for another law school to top NYU for PI. Sure, only about 30% go straight into PI work, but that is a magnificent percentage when you compare it with the $$$$$$ from the BigLaw alternative. The LRAP program, the scholarships, the clinics, the organizations... so many things were PI oriented.