IT'S A DRAW!!!

[If you were waitlisted this year, what's the current status of each of your WLs? (10 max)]

If you were waitlisted this year, what's the current status of each of your WLs? (10 max)

Still WLed

 45 (70.3%)

Accepted off WL

 10 (15.6%)

Rejected off WL

 9 (14.1%)

Total Members Voted: 49

[jeffislouie]

Personally, I find it funny that the libs like to say that Shrillary isn't winning because of sexism (yeah, it's b/c she's a woman, not because she's a psychotic lunatic who is out of her mind, evil, and everyone who has worked for her thinks she is a horrible person).
I also think it is funny that people say that Barrack can't win because of racism (yeah, it's cause he's black, not because he's inexperienced, idealistic to the point of being removed from reality, and completely unprepared to run this country).
But what is staggeringly stupid and hypocritical is that the very same people trying to make excuses for liberal shortcomings attack McCain because he's old.
That is called "ageism" and is a well recognized sterotypical form of discrimination.
He's not "too old".
He scares the die-hard liberals because they know that moderate democrats (who make up the majority of the democrat base) will likely vote for him and against Howard Dean's hardcore liberalism and the moderate republicans (who make up the majority of the republican base) will likely vote for him because they recognize the alternative is weakened national security, financial destruction of american wealth, and the further erosion of the principles that make this nation great.
Neither democrat will win.
That's my position.
Howard Dean and the MSM will spend the upcoming months trying to convince you, the general public, that the democratic candidate will win, just like they did with Kerry and Gore.
They were wrong then and they are very wrong now.
It doesn't matter which candidate the left chooses, both have large enough negatives that the american people will not be able to see past.
Shrillary used the secret service and the FBI to intimidate and discourage women from coming forward to testify against Bill "Mr. Wang" Clinton.  She claims to be behind every initiative that Bill used that worked and nothing that failed.
Her plans include limiting your freedom of choice, increasing your taxes further strangling the economy, and weakining our military just like Bill did.  Bill's secret to his success was his co-opting the republican contract with america.  Hillary is unlikeable, fake, and devoid of any real conviction that doesn't align with her soft-socialism/communism.
Barrack has ties to Rezko, has virtually no experience, and seems to be full of hope without substance.  It just isn't his time yet.  Obama will one day have a real shot....  But not now.
Friends, McCain will win the presidency.

[colalaw]

[jeffislouie]

Oh look, it's the wicked witch of the west!

Good stuff.

Interesting, don't you think, that Shrillary has been making excuses for her consistent losses this february...
That's what we want in a leader.

[To Those Who Do]

Sarcastic?

[To Those Who Do]

Personally, I find it funny that the libs like to say that Shrillary isn't winning because of sexism (yeah, it's b/c she's a woman, not because she's a psychotic lunatic who is out of her mind, evil, and everyone who has worked for her thinks she is a horrible person).

The thing is that this psychotic lunatic who is out of her mind, evil, and everyone who has worked for her thinks she is a horrible person is a woman.

[Martha Michelle]

Personally, I find it funny that the libs like to say that Shrillary isn't winning because of sexism (yeah, it's b/c she's a woman, not because she's a psychotic lunatic who is out of her mind, evil, and everyone who has worked for her thinks she is a horrible person).

The thing is that this psychotic lunatic who is out of her mind, evil, and everyone who has worked for her thinks she is a horrible person is a woman.

Not to mention that,

I also think it is funny that people say that Barrack can't win because of racism (yeah, it's cause he's black, not because he's inexperienced, idealistic to the point of being removed from reality, and completely unprepared to run this country).

This inexperienced, idealistic to the point of being removed from reality, and completely unprepared to run this country is a black person.

But what is staggeringly stupid and hypocritical is that the very same people trying to make excuses for liberal shortcomings attack McCain because he's old. That is called "ageism" and is a well recognized sterotypical form of discrimination. He's not "too old".

He's, indeed, too old. This is a fact and it is not "ageism," a stereotypical form of discrimination.

[jeffislouie]

He's, indeed, too old. This is a fact and it is not "ageism," a stereotypical form of discrimination.

Interesting.
So it is a "fact" that he is too old?  It's not a sterotype or discriminatory statement?
He's 71.
Reagan was 69 when he was elected.
People are living longer and longer. 
Regardless, in order to claim that he is too old and that is a fact, you MUST have some evidence, such as a law, or some sort of presidential rule book.
Scanning the constitution, I don't see any age limit that refers to a maximum age.  Besides, if you listen to McCain, it is pretty clear that his mind is fresh and sharp.
But hey, if that's the worst criticism I hear of McCain, I'm good with that.

[printout]

Sarcastic?

You mean jeffislouie? Or someone else?

[sheherasade]

[QI]