I would definately not be shy about complaining, and I wonder what school you go to where the students would be intimidated or reluctant to do so. I don't agree with the attitude that everyone is in the same boat, so it doesn't matter since you're all graded on the same curve. That's fine as far as competition, but for purposes of the bar exam (not to mention general practice) it would be nice to actually LEARN STUFF rather than just sit through a few months of class and collect your ranking number. How are the students supposed to master the material to their full potential if there is a dramatic change to the teaching style and curriculum emphasis every few weeks?If this were mid-terms, I could understand throwing the original professor back into the mix. However, what on earth is the point of bringing him back in just to teach the final 3 weeks of class? The semester is essentially over at this point! There has to be some kind of political consideration there, because there certainly doesn't seem to be any consideration being given to the students. I wouldn't raise hell in an unprofessional manner, as life certainly isn't always fair... but I wouldn't hesitate to pass around a petition and take it to the administration if a sizable portion of the class signs.
If you remember enough from your FIRST YEAR contracts course to not take BARBRI for the bar exam, then you are incredibly amazing. Your first year is about figuring out how the law works, not remembering anything substantive.
Barbri is just that... it's a "review" course, not a "learn it for the very first time in a couple of weeks" course.
This is absolutely NOT true. You cover more areas of law on the bar than you take courses in law school, unless you try to tailor all of your courses toward the bar exam (this may be true if you go to a lower tiered school, which seem to be geared more toward bar passage). Barbri is a review for subjects you've already taken, but for many areas of law, you're learning things for the first time.
Quote from: johns259 on March 31, 2007, 02:19:31 AMIf you remember enough from your FIRST YEAR contracts course to not take BARBRI for the bar exam, then you are incredibly amazing. Your first year is about figuring out how the law works, not remembering anything substantive.Wow... I don't think I could possibly disagree more.I certainly don't mean to imply that good class performance as a 1L will eliminate the need for a bar review course after graduation. However, Barbri is just that... it's a "review" course, not a "learn it for the very first time in a couple of weeks" course. The idea for a contracts review is to jog your memory on, for example, the rules for excluding parol evidence. If you've never even heard of "parol evidence", or never gained clarity from multiple contradictory explanations, how is a "refresher seminar" supposed to bail you out? It seems to me approaching 1L as just a time to practice IRAC writing would be awfully short-sighted.
Page created in 0.602 seconds with 18 queries.