Law School Discussion

I hate Civ Pro

I hate Civ Pro
« on: October 11, 2006, 12:54:08 PM »
Need to vent. I loathe Civ Pro. I hate the cases. It's so boring. Ugh! Jurisdiction sucks. Can't the damn case book editors add some spice to it?

Thanks for listening. Back to BURGER KING v. RUDZEWICZ (You knew it had to be a Polok).

Re: I hate Civ Pro
« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2006, 01:27:47 PM »
i concur in part, dissent in part

Re: I hate Civ Pro
« Reply #2 on: October 11, 2006, 01:47:31 PM »
HA HA! :D

Re: I hate Civ Pro
« Reply #3 on: October 11, 2006, 02:30:12 PM »
if you are bored now, wait 'til const. law! on the bright side, civ pro II is much more practice orientated and you generally only use the rule book, no cases.

Re: I hate Civ Pro
« Reply #4 on: October 11, 2006, 04:23:40 PM »
Need to vent. I loathe Civ Pro. I hate the cases. It's so boring. Ugh! Jurisdiction sucks. Can't the d**mn case book editors add some spice to it?

Thanks for listening. Back to BURGER KING v. RUDZEWICZ (You knew it had to be a Polok).

the BK case is a fav. of mine.  personal jurisdiction is such a great topic.

Strong

  • ****
  • 397
    • View Profile
Re: I hate Civ Pro
« Reply #5 on: October 11, 2006, 04:50:12 PM »
i concur in part, dissent in part

I concur with parts IIA, IIB, and dissent as to part III, and concur with the other dissent.

Re: I hate Civ Pro
« Reply #6 on: October 11, 2006, 06:50:37 PM »
Under Rule 12(b)(6) I move for dismissal as the OP did not state a claim for which relief may be granted.