Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Poll

Did OJ kill his wife and her boyfriend?

Yes
 11 (57.9%)
No
 3 (15.8%)
No clue
 5 (26.3%)

Total Members Voted: 11

Author Topic: Which supplements do you prefer (1Ls)?  (Read 542 times)

scottyd1982

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 124
    • View Profile
    • I'm a MySpace Whore
Which supplements do you prefer (1Ls)?
« on: September 06, 2006, 10:58:34 AM »
Just curious to see what everybody else is using and why. I started with Emanuel the first two weeks, found them a little too technical, switched to E&E's and I feel more prepared for class than most of my classmates who are just slogging through the cases without any context.
UGPA: 3.4, 3.9 last 3 years
LSAT: 163
B.A.: University of Nevada
Majors: History/Poli Sci

Dates: DePaul ($$), San Francisco ($$), Temple, Villanova, Cincinnati ($$), Pacific ($$), Loyola Marymount, San Diego

Friends: Loyola-Chicago, UC-Davis

Rejections: None

Fiancee: American

NorthEast_1L

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 22
  • www.jimwilsonlawblog.blogspot.com
    • View Profile
Re: Which supplements do you prefer (1Ls)?
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2006, 01:14:41 PM »
I just picked up the Glannon guide with multiple choice questions, and so far it is pretty good.

What about the Emanuel Crunch Time books?  I have that for torts and love that it breaks down everything very systematically.  Does anyone have any advice on how I as a 1L could effectively use the Crunch Time books?  I am planning on purchasing the set.
Jim

legalbeagle

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: Which supplements do you prefer (1Ls)?
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2006, 02:16:51 PM »