Kent (2nd tier-66) or Depaul (3rd tier)?

[Todd]

I'm afraid you missed my point. The problem is not that they accept to many students without adequate facilities, the problem is that they do not coordinate with the Undergrad University to utilize existing facilities which is an administration problem.

[istically]

The DePaul/Loyola/Kent debate has been argued ad nasuem on this board. They are all quality schools, I can't see one being head and shoulders above the other.

Loyola > Kent > DePaul

[abclaw]

The DePaul/Loyola/Kent debate has been argued ad nasuem on this board. They are all quality schools, I can't see one being head and shoulders above the other.

Loyola > Kent > DePaul

Impressive.  You really nailed how to read a rankings list.

[lwr]

My LSAT scores were not good, but my undergrad GPA from UIUC was 3.34.

Unless your LSAT score was 147, I think you should have gotten to a better school from the very beginning. Anyway, now that you've made the top 17% I'd say you do have some chances of being transferred to a better school, say a T3.

[nesty]

lwr, you must be a tight ass! Don't you see the OP has already been accepted by Kent, which is a second-tier? True, he was rejected by the other second-tier, Loyola, but he does have very good chances of transfering pretty much everywhere except for first-tier schools (with some exceptions).

[Mon Ami Gabi]

Don't you see the OP has already been accepted by Kent, which is a second-tier? True, he was rejected by the other second-tier, Loyola,

Well, I guess Kent is not that "elite"! I went once there and I saw way too many races, black, Indian, Polish students with a thick accent, and so on.

[tresbuchon]

Mon Ami, unless you are serious, you are so funny!

LOL LOL LOL

[yon]

Mon Ami, unless you are serious, you are so funny!

LOL LOL LOL

hahaha