A duty is owed to a person that a reasonable person would foresee unreasonable harm.Trick question:Under the rule of sevens, does a 20 year old have the capacity to consent?
Rule of 7s doesn't apply to adults, only to minors....seeks to determine maturity.Consent is a defense, but it can be destroyed through scope, capacity etc.Sales route cannot be converted. Dubya is a lost cause.Quote from: jeffjoe on January 12, 2005, 03:15:24 PMA duty is owed to a person that a reasonable person would foresee unreasonable harm.Trick question:Under the rule of sevens, does a 20 year old have the capacity to consent?
Quote from: Slyone on January 12, 2005, 11:34:45 AMWhen is someone "negligent per se"?I'm not 100% sure, but I believe it is when you break a law in the performance of a tort.
When is someone "negligent per se"?