Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: Detrimental Reliance Hypo  (Read 4059 times)

jeffjoe

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1029
  • ABA? We don't need no stinking ABA.
    • View Profile
Re: Detrimental Reliance Hypo
« Reply #30 on: November 13, 2004, 01:03:03 PM »
If that were the case (and theres objective evidence to that effect, not just her subjective idea) then the reliance would not be reasonble

OK.  That's what I thought.  Eventually I will understand ALL.
Praying for peace in Iraq  +
Praying for the tsunami victims   +

camelbx

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 96
  • 164/2.95
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Detrimental Reliance Hypo
« Reply #31 on: November 13, 2004, 01:07:29 PM »
Out of curiousity how much have y'all covered in Contracts thus far?

jeffjoe

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1029
  • ABA? We don't need no stinking ABA.
    • View Profile
Re: Detrimental Reliance Hypo
« Reply #32 on: November 13, 2004, 01:08:33 PM »
600 pages.    :D

We've covered contract formation, consideration, promissory estoppel, defective formation, we're on mistake now.  There's more, but you're making me think too hard.


Moral obligation, statute of frauds, insufficient agreement,
Praying for peace in Iraq  +
Praying for the tsunami victims   +