Law School Discussion

Detrimental Reliance Hypo

jeffjoe

  • ****
  • 1025
  • ABA? We don't need no stinking ABA.
    • View Profile
Re: Detrimental Reliance Hypo
« Reply #30 on: November 13, 2004, 11:03:03 AM »
If that were the case (and theres objective evidence to that effect, not just her subjective idea) then the reliance would not be reasonble

OK.  That's what I thought.  Eventually I will understand ALL.

camelbx

  • ***
  • 96
  • 164/2.95
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Detrimental Reliance Hypo
« Reply #31 on: November 13, 2004, 11:07:29 AM »
Out of curiousity how much have y'all covered in Contracts thus far?

jeffjoe

  • ****
  • 1025
  • ABA? We don't need no stinking ABA.
    • View Profile
Re: Detrimental Reliance Hypo
« Reply #32 on: November 13, 2004, 11:08:33 AM »
600 pages.    :D

We've covered contract formation, consideration, promissory estoppel, defective formation, we're on mistake now.  There's more, but you're making me think too hard.


Moral obligation, statute of frauds, insufficient agreement,