Law School Discussion

Crimes with J. Smith

jeffjoe

  • ****
  • 1025
  • ABA? We don't need no stinking ABA.
    • View Profile
Re: Crimes with J. Smith
« Reply #30 on: October 06, 2004, 11:57:09 AM »
Has anyone figured out why we are reading State v. Little & Miller?

Dicta

  • ****
  • 415
  • Life Is Good
    • View Profile
Re: Crimes with J. Smith
« Reply #31 on: October 06, 2004, 04:48:18 PM »
Haven't even looked at it yet...have you read the inchoate crimes?
Solicitation, attempt, CONSPIRACY? He said these were his "favorite" crimes. I'll look at it tonight and get back to you.
Susan

Re: Crimes with J. Smith
« Reply #32 on: October 06, 2004, 05:44:43 PM »
Alright!  I'm confused (imagine that).  Wasn't our homework for tomorrow Assignment #6 (State v. Reeves, State v. Kimbrough, State v. Fowler).  I know he said "read Solicitation, Attempt, and Conspiracy".  Were we assigned the cases from #6 AND #7.

I'm confused....help!

Thanks

jeffjoe

  • ****
  • 1025
  • ABA? We don't need no stinking ABA.
    • View Profile
Re: Crimes with J. Smith
« Reply #33 on: October 06, 2004, 05:53:08 PM »
He said he wanted to try to get through all the inchoate crimes.  That's what he told me when I talked to him afterwards.  I dunno.

Dicta

  • ****
  • 415
  • Life Is Good
    • View Profile
Re: Crimes with J. Smith
« Reply #34 on: October 06, 2004, 08:26:05 PM »
I would know all the inchoate crimes stuff, especially the statutes!
He seems like he is moving pretty quickly through this stuff.
Wonder if the final will be "comprehensive"?
S :-\

jeffjoe

  • ****
  • 1025
  • ABA? We don't need no stinking ABA.
    • View Profile
Re: Crimes with J. Smith
« Reply #35 on: October 06, 2004, 08:43:02 PM »
I expect the final to be comprehensive.  I don't know if that's because he said it or I just assume the worst.

I would know all the inchoate crimes stuff, especially the statutes!
He seems like he is moving pretty quickly through this stuff.
Wonder if the final will be "comprehensive"?
S :-\

jeffjoe

  • ****
  • 1025
  • ABA? We don't need no stinking ABA.
    • View Profile
Re: Crimes with J. Smith
« Reply #36 on: October 12, 2004, 12:02:31 PM »
I checked my notes.  The final is comprehensive.


So this week we get just four cases to read and brief.  Four of the longest opinions ever published.  boy, do these judges have a lot to say about the death penalty.

Re: Crimes with J. Smith
« Reply #37 on: October 26, 2004, 09:12:58 AM »
Did Judge Smith waive the cases due this week?  I've checked my notes and don't see anything.  However, I vaguely remember him saying "don't do them and we'll discuss the final".  Was I dreaming?


jeffjoe

  • ****
  • 1025
  • ABA? We don't need no stinking ABA.
    • View Profile
Re: Crimes with J. Smith
« Reply #38 on: October 26, 2004, 09:33:17 AM »
He said that we should scan the drug and prostitution statutes, and we might talk about Blakley v. Washington.

Afterwards, he told me that it will be a "soft lecture".

Did Judge Smith waive the cases due this week?  I've checked my notes and don't see anything.  However, I vaguely remember him saying "don't do them and we'll discuss the final".  Was I dreaming?



Re: Crimes with J. Smith
« Reply #39 on: October 26, 2004, 09:45:12 AM »
Thank you!  ;D