Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: Estate question  (Read 525 times)

michael beeery

  • Guest
Estate question
« on: April 04, 2002, 01:29:01 AM »
Good Day, A question for all , A supreme court clerk    makes a decision concerning a closing of a estate bank acount.This decision is to close the bank account and split the money with the heirs. this is done against the advice of the family lawyer. he then proceeds to retire from his job as a clerk of the court. The new court clerk says no, you must return the money to to the estate.Can the retired clerk be taken to court for his decision and be held responsible for his decision,since the money has been spent????

buggirl92002

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 18
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Estate question
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2004, 03:23:00 PM »
Here's my best response based on your presumably hypothetical fact pattern: 1. Yes, a petition can be filed against the clerk and the agency that employed him at the time of distribution. 2. It is up to the court to decide whether you have sufficiently alleged a claim upon which relief (in law or equity) can be granted. 3. It's my understanding that once an estate distribution has been made, the personal representative (private or state-appointed) has no right to request that it be returned. This is why private fiduciaries who administer estates for a living have bond premiums! 4. If the clerk made an erroneous distribution while acting as an agent of the state, the state may be found liable if the act was within the scope of the clerk's employment. (You don't want to sue the clerk personally -- that's not where the money is). 5. Absent evidence that the distribution was faulty, there is no claim. Was there a testamentary instrument or did the heirs take under the laws of intestacy? These facts must be determined/analysed.