Law School Discussion
Nine Years of Discussion
;
Discussion
Home
Help
Login
Register
Resources
Useful Sites
Blogs
Books
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Law School Discussion
»
Off-Topic Area
»
Meta Discussion
»
For all z (z is a LSD user --> z is addicted) ...?
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: For all z (z is a LSD user --> z is addicted) ...? (Read 467 times)
Fernando
Guest
For all z (z is a LSD user --> z is addicted) ...?
«
on:
March 01, 2005, 03:56:30 AM »
I’m still in self-denial!
LSD= Law School Discussion, for you hot heads who leap to conclusions!
Logged
Cheeks
Sr. Citizen
Posts: 1951
Re: For all z (z is a LSD user --> z is addicted) ...?
«
Reply #1 on:
March 01, 2005, 10:01:52 AM »
135 != addicted.
Logged
Fernando
Guest
Re: For all z (z is a LSD user --> z is addicted) ...?
«
Reply #2 on:
March 01, 2005, 03:34:12 PM »
It’s beginning to look official!
1845= weighty peer review that might qualify for LSD mentoring
Logged
pointdexterish
Sr. Citizen
Posts: 357
95% there
Re: For all z (z is a LSD user --> z is addicted) ...?
«
Reply #3 on:
March 08, 2005, 08:53:45 PM »
Denial isn't a river in Egypt.
*rimshot*
Logged
Juris Novus - the Law Refreshed
Fernando
Guest
Re: For all z (z is a LSD user --> z is addicted) ...?
«
Reply #4 on:
March 09, 2005, 01:14:03 AM »
Ok, now try that less cryptically.
Quote from: pointdexterish on March 08, 2005, 08:53:45 PM
Denial isn't a river in Egypt.
*rimshot*
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Law School Discussion
»
Off-Topic Area
»
Meta Discussion
»
For all z (z is a LSD user --> z is addicted) ...?