Am hoping to start thread for those of us for whom on-line makes sense...who are you? what's your story? why does on-line look good? do you know anyone who's done it & where are they now? what do you think the future of online education is? are we crazy or are we on a new frontier?what do you want to do with your degree?me: 41, new spouse in lucrative career demanding moves (domestic & overseas) whom I will not separate from, manage/negotiate commercial contracts.traditional programs to me are all about numbers and not about law: LSAT number, school ranking, class ranking, financial aid packages, competition to place in top-10 firms, competition for clerkships & externships.I just want to practice law, dude. stay in commercial contracts, get more corporate experience, understand the UCC, etc.without taking the LSATs, I've gotten lots of encouragement from lawyers I've worked/negotiated with to get the JD although most think I'm nuts not to go accredited. hope to hear from others in like situation. cheers.
Quote from: jemimah20 on February 04, 2005, 09:33:29 AMAm hoping to start thread for those of us for whom on-line makes sense...who are you? what's your story? why does on-line look good? do you know anyone who's done it & where are they now? what do you think the future of online education is? are we crazy or are we on a new frontier?what do you want to do with your degree?me: 41, new spouse in lucrative career demanding moves (domestic & overseas) whom I will not separate from, manage/negotiate commercial contracts.traditional programs to me are all about numbers and not about law: LSAT number, school ranking, class ranking, financial aid packages, competition to place in top-10 firms, competition for clerkships & externships.I just want to practice law, dude. stay in commercial contracts, get more corporate experience, understand the UCC, etc.without taking the LSATs, I've gotten lots of encouragement from lawyers I've worked/negotiated with to get the JD although most think I'm nuts not to go accredited. hope to hear from others in like situation. cheers.I briefly looked into the on-line thing when I was first applying, because I did not exactly excel on the LSAT, and I too, have a job I love that I will not give up. But here is the conclusion I came to: on-line is fine if you just want to learn about the law, or maybe if you live in California and already have it worked out with where you want to work that upon completion they will let you practice (after the bar, of course), but other than those situations it doesn't really seem like a worthy option. So I am applying part-time to anywhere I can conceivably drive to after work each day. It may make for a rough four years, but it is, after all, only four years, and I will gain so much at the end of it all.Whatever you decide to do, good luck!
I live in the Philly area (NE Philly) and considering the same things as you. I'm almost 25, work full time, need to keep health insurance, and I want to go to law school part time. From what I've researched, only Temple, Rutgers-Camden, and Widener (DE) are feasible. My dream is to get into Temple because it's cheap and has a great tax law prgram. I'm an undergrad Accounting major with a 3.04 UGPA. Hvae yet to take LSATs because I'm still contemplating whether it's worth it or not. Which online programs would you consider? Let me know how it goes! Good luck to you.
I am not trying to rain on anyone's parade, but I strongly suggest all of you try an online course before you sign up for an online J.D.Because of work, and as a requirement of a teaching program, I am taking an online biology class...I have to tell you that it is the worst educational experience I have ever had. And I am pretty agreeable to just about any situation, but I just can't stand it. It has nothing to do with the teacher or the material - it's a 100% sucky format.You may love it, or even find it bearable, but I am not learning anything and it is very tedious in a way that is not fun.