Law School Discussion

s-t-a-n-f-o-r-d

'lit

  • ****
  • 642
    • View Profile
Re: s-t-a-n-f-o-r-d
« Reply #10 on: January 19, 2005, 12:35:44 PM »
WOWzer!

Congratulations just doesn't seem to be enough.
You only need the 'H' to complete the HYS bingo.


i think maybe the Hs and Cs (and even Ps) are really fixating on those numbers, so it's highly unlikely. i'm not greedy though   :D  i'll take what i got and run with it!

dreamer1

  • ****
  • 332
  • CLS '08
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: s-t-a-n-f-o-r-d
« Reply #11 on: January 19, 2005, 12:41:18 PM »
I think the Cs just like to take more time, I hope. I know Bearizzle got into Columbia ED with an LSAT score of 168...

It would be my top choice, but I don't think that's where I will end up... :'(

NYKnicks

Re: s-t-a-n-f-o-r-d
« Reply #12 on: January 19, 2005, 12:42:05 PM »
Lexy is fawkin amazing :o ;)

cutcut

  • ****
  • 347
  • I remember it as if it were a meal ago
    • View Profile
Re: s-t-a-n-f-o-r-d
« Reply #13 on: January 19, 2005, 12:51:09 PM »
Nice one, doll. What are Stanford's chances, vis-a-vis Yale?

Are we there yet?

  • ****
  • 183
  • We should all do our part...
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: s-t-a-n-f-o-r-d
« Reply #14 on: January 19, 2005, 12:52:16 PM »
lexy,

I think you got someone else's NYU and Penn hold letters...you should notify them right away!

midjeep

  • ****
  • 1295
    • View Profile
Re: s-t-a-n-f-o-r-d
« Reply #15 on: January 19, 2005, 12:56:04 PM »
Congrats Lexy,
 
Have fun deciding!(go to Yale and have all attorneys kiss your butt or go to Stanford and have all attorneys kiss your butt....decisions, decisions  :-*)

TDPookie1

  • *****
  • 7929
  • the sugar cane is back!
    • AOL Instant Messenger - PookieEsq2B
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: s-t-a-n-f-o-r-d
« Reply #16 on: January 19, 2005, 12:56:39 PM »
What are Stanford's chances...?

wouldn't that be awesome if stanford sat around obsessing the way we do?  "hey, we got this lexy girl; what are our chances?  should we have safety acceptees?  is lexy too reachy for us?  we're 37.44/-122.15."

(the numbers are latitude and longitude, respectively)

Re: s-t-a-n-f-o-r-d
« Reply #17 on: January 19, 2005, 12:59:36 PM »
What are Stanford's chances...?

wouldn't that be awesome if stanford sat around obsessing the way we do?  "hey, we got this lexy girl; what are our chances?  should we have safety acceptees?  is lexy too reachy for us?  we're 37.44/-122.15."

(the numbers are latitude and longitude, respectively)


:D :D  Pooks, you have a TALENT for law school humor.  It's almost disconcerting.

And lex, CONGRATS.

foxnewssucks

Re: s-t-a-n-f-o-r-d
« Reply #18 on: January 19, 2005, 01:01:43 PM »
What are Stanford's chances...?

wouldn't that be awesome if stanford sat around obsessing the way we do?  "hey, we got this lexy girl; what are our chances?  should we have safety acceptees?  is lexy too reachy for us?  we're 37.44/-122.15."

(the numbers are latitude and longitude, respectively)

hahahha

NYKnicks

Re: s-t-a-n-f-o-r-d
« Reply #19 on: January 19, 2005, 01:02:26 PM »
What are Stanford's chances...?

wouldn't that be awesome if stanford sat around obsessing the way we do?  "hey, we got this lexy girl; what are our chances?  should we have safety acceptees?  is lexy too reachy for us?  we're 37.44/-122.15."

(the numbers are latitude and longitude, respectively)

choked on my soda. thanks.