Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: Non-Trad Dec. LSAT call-out  (Read 2648 times)

WitterUin4

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 629
  • How I thought of ad comms
    • View Profile
    • My blog
Non-Trad Dec. LSAT call-out
« on: December 24, 2004, 12:43:07 PM »
How'd y'all score?
I'm at 1L at CU Boulder

Southern Gentleman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 72
    • View Profile
Re: Non-Trad Dec. LSAT call-out
« Reply #1 on: December 25, 2004, 12:44:13 AM »
157 for me. Not as well as I would've liked, but not too bad either. I can live with it.
In: Jones
Hold: n/a
Rejected: n/a
Applied: Jones, Tulsa, Widener

mchek

  • Guest
Re: Non-Trad Dec. LSAT call-out
« Reply #2 on: December 25, 2004, 04:40:58 AM »
162. I was hoping for 164-166 but have definately come to terms with the 162. This board makes me feel inadequate. :P

Highway

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 497
    • View Profile
Re: Non-Trad Dec. LSAT call-out
« Reply #3 on: December 25, 2004, 06:27:21 AM »
158. Not what I was hoping for, but then I really only put in about 5-6 total hours of studying. I'm not one of those people that has to go to law school or I'll jump off a bridge. I'm just doing it for my own personal satisfaction - found no need to kill myself studying for the LSAT.

So now I'm right at about 50% LSAT score and 50% uGPA for the one school I'm applying to for evening division. Hoping my 3.9 graduate GPA and 5 years of WE pull me over at this point.

Jeff

Foot Fetish

  • Guest
Re: Non-Trad Dec. LSAT call-out
« Reply #4 on: December 25, 2004, 08:06:44 PM »
How'd y'all score?

158.  Now, your turn.  What's your shoe size?

wanderingalaskan

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 105
  • Probably won't have moose in the yard at UT!
    • View Profile
    • WanderingAlaskan's LS info
    • Email
Re: Non-Trad Dec. LSAT call-out
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2004, 08:57:45 PM »
165 in December after a disappointing 161 in Oct.  I am happy with the results, although like most I would have preferred better. 

lauralynne

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 149
  • '02 PSU Alum
    • AOL Instant Messenger - LangelK
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Non-Trad Dec. LSAT call-out
« Reply #6 on: December 28, 2004, 09:06:39 PM »
163.  I'm happy. Was at 151 at Kaplan Diagnostic...

Hopefully will get me into Pitt.
I will be a Nittany Lion turned Pitt Panther for 1L 2005.

www.lawschoolnumbers.com/display.php?cycle=0405&user=xpsupiphi

grannypants

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 96
  • In my day nickels had pictures of bumble bees
    • View Profile
Re: Non-Trad Dec. LSAT call-out
« Reply #7 on: December 29, 2004, 05:15:57 PM »
So bad that I really thought they sent me somebody else's score. I tested about 158-162 on about 36 timed practice tests and well...let's just say my BA II Calc could have taken the LCraps for me and scored better. Maybe some adcomms will throw me a bone plus I applied to schools that haven't had any students from my undergrad (Toolane) and the great state of Illinois (in recent classes). Plus, I'm old (ok not really but by law school admissions, I fall into the 24-50 bracket at some schools) I also have 6 years WE in Finance/Accounting and a 3.89 in a masters. Sigh....can't wait for those reject letters to roll in. Thanks LSAT for crushing my self-esteem.

limonjello

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 501
  • Not me as a kid, but me in 34 years
    • View Profile
Re: Non-Trad Dec. LSAT call-out
« Reply #8 on: January 13, 2005, 01:26:58 PM »
170.  I studied quite a bit for this one.  Started out testing in the low 160s and had a couple of 176 practices.  REALLY wish I had gotten the latest LSAT tests earlier, as the move to more focus on the reading comp is what really brought me down.  Not bitching overall, but I am really aiming for UT, and with my GPA, any help is a good thing.   :)

linquest

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 999
    • View Profile
Re: Non-Trad Dec. LSAT call-out
« Reply #9 on: January 14, 2005, 01:02:34 AM »
157 :(
Fed gov't atty