If a draft was approved I would definitely dodge it if I was fighting in a war like Iraq. If a war is waged for the self-intersts of a country, and is unneccessary and detrimental to all, I think it would be immoral to fight in it. While I think Iraq may have been waged more for interests of welfare than normal, it still tends to fall under the unneccesary and detrimental heading. How long do you think it is going to take before a country uses pre-emptive strike policy on the U.S.? Which is why I don't feel bad towards politicians that dodged the draft for Vietnam. I think very rarely does America exhaust all its options before going to war. Just look at the evidence that Bob Woodward presents towards Bush's deliberation before attacking Iraq.
While the middle east certainly has large problems with democracy, free rights, etc, it has frequently been the case that America has prevented these formations (at least to the extent that they exist in the Middle East) in order to take advantage of natural resources in the area. Iran is one example, in which we supported Raza Shah, because the existing leader wanted to take back the natural resources of Iran for its people (the British and Americans wanted that oil, as well as tobacco).
While I obviously hate the fact that we are in Iraq, I think we have a responsibility to stabilize the nation before we leave. We created this mess, we have to clean it up. I think leaving pre-maturely would be very detrimental in terms of regional stability and terrorist activity.
I don't believe Israel is a good example of democracy. When you have to expel 3 million people from their land to found your democracy and kill thousands of innocents I think democracy is the wrong word. That's not to say I'm against zionism or the Jewish people, but I think the way they've gone about creating a Jewish state is wrong. I don't believe religious claims that are 2000 years old (I'm a religion major so I know Jewish history) justify what occurred in Palestine in 1948. I also think that the Israeli army tends to react with excessive force towards Palestinians. This does not erase the fact that Palestinians do bomb Israelis everyday, but looking at the issue from a strategic point of view, this seems to be a result of the fact that Palestinians have no hope of beating the Israelis face to face. When you have two enemies, one strong and one weak, guerilla warfare is frequently used by the weaker enemy. I would argue you can interrpet the bombings as such, though I would also admit that they are religiously motivated.