Thats admitted. They could be admitting a lot of people with a 175, but none actually go. The actual enrolled median is probbaly 3-4 pts lower, meaning the median for actual GMU students is a 162 for example./
Yeah, but that doesn't change the fact that the median LSAT has risen from 2003. In 2003, when the 75th %tile was 164, for enrolled students, the 75th %tile was most likely a few points lower than that.
Am I alone in thinking this post makes no sense?
I'm sorry, but what part of that isn't making sense? Am I missing something here?
The OP was pointing out that GMU's LSAT score has risen (based on info from 2004 admits compared to 2003)
Then regist basically said that the OP's data was only for admitted students and that the median for matriculating GMU students is probably a few points lower than admitted students.
My point was that it doesn't really matter who is going to GMU or that the median for matriculating students is lower than admitted...The data for schools ususally IS the data for admitted students, not for actual enrolled students. I believe that the OP was basically saying that was GMU's LSAT median is going up, and I was just trying to say that regist's comment doesn't change what the OP said.