Done With the LSAT

[Cory]

My experimental was LG, so I knew right after the test. I was hoping the first LG would be real because I thought it was easy, but the scored LG was pretty easy too. Maybe it was just the fact I took the last few days off from studying LSATs because my brain was fried, but I didn't think it was too bad.

Edited: Just read in another thread about not discussing it...im EST-centric, sorry.

[lauralynne]

I also had
RC
LR
RC
LR
LG

The consensus where I took the test is that my section 3 was experimental...thank God!  

So, $1200 and 2 months of studying later, I thought it was rather anti-climactic, but this month of waiting will be next to impossible...

[JMac42]

My test went:
RC
LR
RC
LR
LG

So, are we definitly sure that Section 3 was experimental?
I hope so... that RC sections was really hard. What do you all think?

I had the same as you and the 2nd RC was a lot more difficult and did not have the same consistency in difficulty as the 1st.

[All*eggs=1basket]

LR
RC
LR
LG
LR

100 questions, thought LG was difficult

[Trip]

Somebody please reassure me and tell me section 3 was experimental...

[Showtyme5]

LR
RC
LR
LG
LR

100 questions, thought LG was difficult

Exactly

[ryanjm]

Section 3 was the experimental and there were 100 questions. LG was easy in my opinion. There were no games there that even came close to such games as the June 2000 CD game. It appears that the trend of increasing the RC difficulty and decreasing the games is continuing. Only 22 questions in games again. The only "tough" game was the picture game, but if you practiced the "bird game" in one of the past year's lsats, you'd have a good idea how to do it.


I thought the first LR was tough, and the second one easy. I've never had 3-4 mins to review answers on LR, but I did this time on the second one.
My order:
LR
RC
LG
LG
LR

[matt1882]

How did the picture game go again? I think I did well on the games section, but I've forgotten most of the background information.

Section 3 was the experimental and there were 100 questions. LG was easy in my opinion. There were no games there that even came close to such games as the June 2000 CD game. It appears that the trend of increasing the RC difficulty and decreasing the games is continuing. Only 22 questions in games again. The only "tough" game was the picture game, but if you practiced the "bird game" in one of the past year's lsats, you'd have a good idea how to do it.


I thought the first LR was tough, and the second one easy. I've never had 3-4 mins to review answers on LR, but I did this time on the second one.
My order:
LR
RC
LG
LG
LR

[deek]

Mine was

LR 26 Ques
RC 27 Ques
LR 26 Ques
LG 22 Ques
LR 25 Ques

This test had to have 100 Questions. I really f'ed up the first section--I thought it was hard and didn't come close to finishing, which was never a problem in practice, so I was hoping that'd be experimental. But it seems like it's definitely Section 3 based on the other posts. What do you guys think the scoring scale will be like? 

[Everyman]

I'm hoping that it's something like 88=170.