Law School Discussion

.

sara

  • ****
  • 144
    • AOL Instant Messenger - ladysphynx
    • View Profile
    • Blog
.
« on: November 09, 2004, 06:19:45 PM »
 :-[

jaxon

Re: Has anyone been rejected yet (for Fall 2005)?
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2004, 08:19:09 PM »
None so far for me (cheers) let's hope it stays that way!

I was just curious...

yes, see my other thread on South Dakota Bible U.

Javert

  • ****
  • 1610
  • Time.
    • AOL Instant Messenger - Rov47
    • View Profile
    • Spirit of Sisyphus
Re: Has anyone been rejected yet (for Fall 2005)?
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2004, 06:58:28 PM »
None so far for me (cheers) let's hope it stays that way!

I was just curious...

Not quite, but Yale sent me a letter saying, "Don't even think about applying to Yale. Yale understands that applying to law school can be difficult and expensive. To ensure you don't waste our admissions staff's valuable time, we're doubling the application fee. If you lack the good sense it takes not to apply, please include a copy of this letter with your application.".

HTH.

pointdexterish

  • ****
  • 357
  • 95% there
    • View Profile
    • Juris Novus
Re: Has anyone been rejected yet (for Fall 2005)?
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2004, 01:06:16 PM »
I was thinking about this today.  It makes sense that the schools send out rejection letters later in the application season because they may want to hold on to possible admits in case there is an opening near the end of the cycle.

Re: Has anyone been rejected yet (for Fall 2005)?
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2004, 07:00:42 PM »
I was thinking about this today.  It makes sense that the schools send out rejection letters later in the application season because they may want to hold on to possible admits in case there is an opening near the end of the cycle.

I think thats what waitlisting is for? If your credentials are very poor they're gonna reject you no matter what? I think its that middle-some that get kept for awhile. I think?

dr_draino

Re: Has anyone been rejected yet (for Fall 2005)?
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2004, 07:07:21 PM »
I was thinking about this today.  It makes sense that the schools send out rejection letters later in the application season because they may want to hold on to possible admits in case there is an opening near the end of the cycle.

I think thats what waitlisting is for? If your credentials are very poor they're gonna reject you no matter what? I think its that middle-some that get kept for awhile. I think?

Are you an "upspeaker"?

pointdexterish

  • ****
  • 357
  • 95% there
    • View Profile
    • Juris Novus
Re: Has anyone been rejected yet (for Fall 2005)?
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2004, 10:43:29 PM »
Are you an "upspeaker"?

Up speaker eh?  Not familiar, what is an up speaker?

DanielN

  • ****
  • 387
  • who the hell is this? ... seriously!
    • View Profile
Re: Has anyone been rejected yet (for Fall 2005)?
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2004, 10:58:15 PM »
ohh god this is going to be ingrained in my brain forever


please draino say what an up-speaker is

please
please


i will sell my sole to know what an up speaker is...

well not really.

jayhawk

Re: Has anyone been rejected yet (for Fall 2005)?
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2004, 11:04:01 PM »
Are you an "upspeaker"?

Up speaker eh?  Not familiar, what is an up speaker?

i think he was referring to ending every sentence with a question mark? 

DanielN

  • ****
  • 387
  • who the hell is this? ... seriously!
    • View Profile
Re: Has anyone been rejected yet (for Fall 2005)?
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2004, 11:16:02 PM »
good observation

"i think thats what waitlisting is for" is most definitly not a question!