Law School Discussion

No More Pictures in Signatures

Ninja

  • ****
  • 569
    • View Profile
Re: No More Pictures in Signatures
« Reply #20 on: October 17, 2004, 06:17:48 PM »
Sweet, now I won't have to see Desi and those two girls everyday.

Andrew

  • 731
  • "I just think the thing should work properly."
    • View Profile
    • Andrew Sinclair
Re: No More Pictures in Signatures
« Reply #21 on: October 17, 2004, 06:56:43 PM »
haha - It's the most complaint browser on the internets.

For some reason there have been a lot of people complaining about other people today - so I've been typing that word a lot trying to straighten things out.

What do other people thing about the height restriction?

buster

Re: No More Pictures in Signatures
« Reply #22 on: October 17, 2004, 07:18:41 PM »
I support both the height restriction and the removal of pictures from signatures. Other things I support include John Kerry, cursing and the f-ing Red Sox.


haha - It's the most complaint browser on the internets.

For some reason there have been a lot of people complaining about other people today - so I've been typing that word a lot trying to straighten things out.

What do other people thing about the height restriction?

DOWNY

Re: No More Pictures in Signatures
« Reply #23 on: October 17, 2004, 07:24:25 PM »
For some reason there have been a lot of people complaining about other people today - so I've been typing that word a lot trying to straighten things out.

Andrew,

Assuming I have been the person most complained about, I wanted to advance my theory that most of the complaints are coming from a few individuals, not a majority of users. I could be wrong, but the IPs might prove otherwise. Either way, I will be laying low for awhile until everything is sorted out.

Love,
DOWNY

TDPookie1

  • *****
  • 7973
  • the sugar cane is back!
    • AOL Instant Messenger - PookieEsq2B
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: No More Pictures in Signatures
« Reply #24 on: October 17, 2004, 07:52:26 PM »
I support both the height restriction and the removal of pictures from signatures. Other things I support include John Kerry, cursing and the f-ing Red Sox.

hey, me too!  actually, i have no opinion on the red sox, but if the new me supports them, the old me will too for purposes of consistency.

buster

Re: No More Pictures in Signatures
« Reply #25 on: October 17, 2004, 08:30:33 PM »
Hey, thanks! And welcome to a lifetime of crushing heartbreak!

hey, me too!  actually, i have no opinion on the red sox, but if the new me supports them, the old me will too for purposes of consistency.

superiorlobe

Re: No More Pictures in Signatures
« Reply #26 on: October 17, 2004, 08:32:32 PM »
I am annoyed by the double pookie.  Buster, go get your own avatar.

TDPookie1

  • *****
  • 7973
  • the sugar cane is back!
    • AOL Instant Messenger - PookieEsq2B
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: No More Pictures in Signatures
« Reply #27 on: October 17, 2004, 10:37:32 PM »
Hey, thanks! And welcome to a lifetime of crushing heartbreak!

hey, me too!  actually, i have no opinion on the red sox, but if the new me supports them, the old me will too for purposes of consistency.

i'm a bulls fan, so i kinda understand :)  at least you guys *make* it to the world series.

absy

  • ****
  • 3835
    • View Profile
Re: No More Pictures in Signatures
« Reply #28 on: October 17, 2004, 10:42:42 PM »
I just think that buster should change his screenname to TDPookie2

TDPookie1

  • *****
  • 7973
  • the sugar cane is back!
    • AOL Instant Messenger - PookieEsq2B
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: No More Pictures in Signatures
« Reply #29 on: October 17, 2004, 10:45:45 PM »
I just think that buster should change his screenname to TDPookie2

 :D

buster and i are going to go to quinnipiac if we don't get into yale and if they change their name to quinnipookiac.  i got another packet from them today.  lexy's description of them on the "if law school were a woman" thread was perfect: "ooh, a party?  where?  can i come?"