Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Author Topic: 2009 USNWR rankings  (Read 53933 times)

m1

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 965
    • View Profile
Re: 2009 USNWR rankings
« Reply #10 on: March 25, 2008, 09:43:48 PM »
picture coming, hold one second

steuby

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 145
    • View Profile
Re: 2009 USNWR rankings
« Reply #11 on: March 25, 2008, 09:45:53 PM »
what about 31-50? not to give you extra work, but that's important to some of us. :(

steuby

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 145
    • View Profile
Re: 2009 USNWR rankings
« Reply #12 on: March 25, 2008, 09:49:10 PM »
I didn't see it before I posted -- thanks.

m1

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 965
    • View Profile
Re: 2009 USNWR rankings
« Reply #13 on: March 25, 2008, 09:49:52 PM »

vjm

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 1070
    • View Profile
Re: 2009 USNWR rankings
« Reply #14 on: March 25, 2008, 09:51:22 PM »
Looks like all botbot's hard work has paid off!

newjaytdot

  • Guest
Re: 2009 USNWR rankings
« Reply #15 on: March 25, 2008, 09:54:48 PM »
The rankings make a lot of sense to me.  It seemed as though BC was greatly underappreciated.  I also predicted Notre Dame would make a leap, although I didn't think it would be so huge. 

I don't know how Emory can hold onto its position still.  IMO Emory and BC should change positions. 

One of the more surprising things I noticed was that Syracuse edged its way back into the top 100.  Go figure?

deedeeleigh

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 195
    • View Profile
    • lsn
Re: 2009 USNWR rankings
« Reply #16 on: March 25, 2008, 10:02:11 PM »
WUSTL only has 83.9 percent employment at graduation? That seems oddly low. Is it a location thing? ND seems to have a similar number. 

Can't believe there is such a huge gap in the overall score between CLS and Chicago. 88 to 80? That's a lot of ground for Chicago to cover.

familyman

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 44
    • View Profile
Re: 2009 USNWR rankings
« Reply #17 on: March 25, 2008, 10:03:29 PM »
We should have a better scan by now, one that includes 1-100 eh?

m1

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 965
    • View Profile
Re: 2009 USNWR rankings
« Reply #18 on: March 25, 2008, 10:04:33 PM »
i didn't feel like taking pics of the whole thing :P

m1

  • Sr. Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 965
    • View Profile
Re: 2009 USNWR rankings
« Reply #19 on: March 25, 2008, 10:05:30 PM »
yes, but the scan is relatively crappy