It's tough because she was offered a substantial scholly from Tulane and not so much from WUSTL. AND because where she ultimately intends to practice does not indicate a clear winner betwixt the two. I read Post #1, see?!
This is a no-brainer, go to Tulane.Tulane and WUSTL are very similar schools. They both don't have much of a home market. They place in biglaw about the same, with WUSTL maybe 10% better depending on the firm. They both have a lot of students who want to go to big markets (Chicago, NYC, DC) but probably won't get the chance once they see their grades. So a lot of these students go to the big cities anyway and do ID/doc review.They both have some regional pull in midwest or south respectively. I'd say for smaller firms within their region, the reputation is about the same.Yes, WUSTL is on the way up and Tulane is on the way down. This won't matter within the next 3 years though.The most important thing they have in common: neither is worth full price.
Tulane is on the way down? Link?
I'm not flaming! Your school doesn't have any money and its city got hit by a hurricane! Plus it's been a 40s school for the past few years despite its reputation and it's now tied for the lowest ranking in the entire first tier!
I'm not flaming! Your school doesn't have any money and its city got hit by a hurricane! Plus it's been a 40s school for the past few years despite its reputation and it's now tied for the lowest ranking in the entire first tier!And basically, my point is that it's still not that much different than WUSTL, placement-wise.