Short time lurker, first time poster. WUSTL accepted me with a full-ride, but Chicago probably won't give me anything because I'm a splitter. Which would you choose? I want to practice at a Big Firm in Chicago, like Kirkland, but I'm worried about the debt burden. I've heard that a lot of the Chicago firms won't take you unless you're at the top half of any school, even Chicago. Furthermore, the cost of the Chicago degree is high -- at least 100k.I plan to stay in the Midwest.
So I should pick WUSTL? I'm leaning in that direction as well.
anyone crazy enough to want to practice at a big law firm who gets into a top14 school should have no compunction about passing on a scholarship to a lower school. you're pretty much guaranteed a job at a large law firm unless you screw it up coming out of chicago. the same is not true at wustl. taking scholarships is for people like me who want to come out with no debt and hate the idea of working for a law firm.
Quote from: motorolalawyer on February 25, 2008, 10:32:36 PMIt's a tough choice but I would personally lean toward WUSTL with a full-ride. What happens if you hate biglaw and you want to leave? It will be difficult because you will have a lot of debt to pay off. I have a friend from a Top 5 that could not stand biglaw and left. He now has a load of debt and wishes he took his full-ride at a T25. A lot of people do not realize how big of a burden debt is.No offense, but you don't think your friend could have mustered the will to stay there for a few more years? I'll be graduating at a young age without a wife and family.
It's a tough choice but I would personally lean toward WUSTL with a full-ride. What happens if you hate biglaw and you want to leave? It will be difficult because you will have a lot of debt to pay off. I have a friend from a Top 5 that could not stand biglaw and left. He now has a load of debt and wishes he took his full-ride at a T25. A lot of people do not realize how big of a burden debt is.