Quote from: Upset T14 Student on February 01, 2008, 07:58:19 AMI do agree that there should be a cut-off for law schools (there probably should be no T3 or T4). i disagree with this. i don't think the solution is to limit the number of lawyers or opportunities for people who want to become lawyers. i think there are people who would do well in law who simply don't have the numbers to get into higher ranked schools. i think the solution is rather for the ABA to refuse accreditation to any law school whose tuition and costs do not bear a reasonable relationship to the expected job prospects (we can debate reasonable relationship later).
I do agree that there should be a cut-off for law schools (there probably should be no T3 or T4).
Quote from: Kurt Sexington on February 01, 2008, 12:33:33 AM...how much 130K in student debt is? I mean, besides the students admitted to the top half of the T14 that are virtually assured BigLaw, everyone else is making a seirous gamble if they plan on paying full tution to a Tier 2 or even bottom part of T50 school. 130K is ALOT of money to pay back, especially at 9%+ interest and you better be DAMN SURE you have a 80K+ job lined up right out of law school if you want to avoid crushing, life altering debt.Now invariably people will respond with the usual accusations that I'm a pessimist or that I am bitter because such and such a law school denied me. But try proving to me that spending 100K+ on a law school education that may land you a 40K job after graduation, or none at all in some cases, is worth it.There are plenty of options open to defer the debt you will incur:1) Work for a few years, save some money for school, be a paralegal and see if law is for you2) Go part-time and work to defer the cost3) Take scholarships at lower ranked schools. All of you who have never held a real job, worked in a law firm or paid you own way or have been successful at anything but school are taking a risk. Most people don’t end up staying in the first real profession they enter. Biglaw has an 80% turnover rate. If you suck at being a lawyer not even that Yale degree is going to save you. Yes, top 14 degree means you much likely to get a higher paying first job, it does not mean you are guaranteed to keep it long enough to pay off your loans. Its not like you can just lateral from one big firm that let you go to another big firm, if you suck at your profession. Nor is a mid-sized firm going to pay you big bucks if you’re an ex-big law 3-year associate, all you have done is write memos and dock review, you don’t have any practical experience they want, a 1st year associate at a small firm knows more than you do.Life is full of risk, if you want to be a lawyer, and you actually happen to be good at something you know nothing about now, then it will all work out in the end, you will payy off your loans at some point, even if you go to the best school and you turn out not to actually be a good lawyer, that debt is not going to disappear when your high paying job does. I think either way the pople who go to law school just to make money are going to be dispaointed, either becuase of debt, or becuase of what the work really is, or becuase they paid alot of money to eneter a profesion they know zero about. If you go to law school truley wanting to be a lawyer you'll not be as rich with lots of loans, but you will enjoy what you do everyday, evetually you will get those loans paid off, and will likley be better at it than someone who just went for the money.
...how much 130K in student debt is? I mean, besides the students admitted to the top half of the T14 that are virtually assured BigLaw, everyone else is making a seirous gamble if they plan on paying full tution to a Tier 2 or even bottom part of T50 school. 130K is ALOT of money to pay back, especially at 9%+ interest and you better be DAMN SURE you have a 80K+ job lined up right out of law school if you want to avoid crushing, life altering debt.Now invariably people will respond with the usual accusations that I'm a pessimist or that I am bitter because such and such a law school denied me. But try proving to me that spending 100K+ on a law school education that may land you a 40K job after graduation, or none at all in some cases, is worth it.
Quote from: troublemaker on February 01, 2008, 09:01:33 AMQuote from: Upset T14 Student on February 01, 2008, 07:58:19 AMI do agree that there should be a cut-off for law schools (there probably should be no T3 or T4). i disagree with this. i don't think the solution is to limit the number of lawyers or opportunities for people who want to become lawyers. i think there are people who would do well in law who simply don't have the numbers to get into higher ranked schools. i think the solution is rather for the ABA to refuse accreditation to any law school whose tuition and costs do not bear a reasonable relationship to the expected job prospects (we can debate reasonable relationship later).This debate rattles on LSD, XOXO, and jdunderground all the time. It really is silly for someone to say "let's abolish the T3 and T4 schools." Arguments for:1. Protect some people (less than 20,000), from illusions of grandeur.2. Increase salaries for all other lawyers.Arguments against:1. Increase the cost of legal services, thus reducing the number of lower-income individuals who can afford legal services.2. Even further perpetuate an elitist market.3. Freedom of a person to choose his/her career.
Quote from: Matthies on February 01, 2008, 10:20:35 AMQuote from: troublemaker on February 01, 2008, 10:16:28 AMQuote from: Matthies on February 01, 2008, 10:14:25 AMIts not like you can just lateral from one big firm that let you go to another big firm, if you suck at your profession. actually you can do this so long as it's not too obvious that you suck at your profession. Yea, you need to see the writing on the wall and lateral BEFORE the firm makes the decsion for you exactly. but they'll probably give you a lot of time before they do this. i mean how often do you hear about people getting pushed out for performance reasons?
Quote from: troublemaker on February 01, 2008, 10:16:28 AMQuote from: Matthies on February 01, 2008, 10:14:25 AMIts not like you can just lateral from one big firm that let you go to another big firm, if you suck at your profession. actually you can do this so long as it's not too obvious that you suck at your profession. Yea, you need to see the writing on the wall and lateral BEFORE the firm makes the decsion for you
Quote from: Matthies on February 01, 2008, 10:14:25 AMIts not like you can just lateral from one big firm that let you go to another big firm, if you suck at your profession. actually you can do this so long as it's not too obvious that you suck at your profession.
Its not like you can just lateral from one big firm that let you go to another big firm, if you suck at your profession.
strongly disagree. wiimote bashes lower tiered schools and the people who attend them solely for the purpose of making himself better about himself; he has no concern for the well-being of others. i'm not convinced that OP is doing the same, rather he appears (for now) to be trying to provide a public service announcement that he believes to be of value.
J, if you didn't bring enough penis for everyone, you shouldn't have brought any penis at all.
This post awakened me to just how stupid I was being in my legal pursuits. I filed my drop out paper today, just in time for the 75% refund.THANKS OP YOU SAVED MY LIFE.