Don't act smart, Pam. Obviously you can't be. [/quoteHahaaa! Just another reason Ender's one of my favorite LSDers.
Quote from: Wallace Stevens on January 17, 2008, 12:50:55 AMCan anyone answer my question?Why UCLA over Boalt, if you could pick?Simple preference of Los Angeles over Berkeley. This is why I picked UCLA over Berkeley for undergrad.I'd probably lean towards Berkeley for LS because I've already spent four years at UCLA and because it has better career options, but to act like it is "unfathomable" is to be a rankings whore and not realize people have other priorities.
Can anyone answer my question?Why UCLA over Boalt, if you could pick?
I would never pick LA over Berkley, that's just dumb. UCLA is so freaking over-rated and overly selective.*BTW, i'm ultra bitter because I got rejected for Undergrad*Brings back horrible memories... as USC says...FUCLA
I'm not trying to pull off anything. I wouldn't have asked the question just to be annoying. Someone earlier in the thread mentioned UCLA over Boalt, and I wanted to know why.
Eh. I wish I could be more carpe diem, but let's not turn this thread into something it's not meant to be.
How are you balancing the time? It sounds rather tough to deal with your respective schedules, much less both of them.
Quote from: theflyingmachine on January 17, 2008, 12:08:54 AMI also don't understand why legitimate discussions concerning Affirmative Action are automatically dismissed as flames or as being silly.We have a forum for this.http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/board,31.0.htmlKnock yourself out.
I also don't understand why legitimate discussions concerning Affirmative Action are automatically dismissed as flames or as being silly.
Like many have said, TFM, this is a thread about the UCLA waitlist. Start a new thread if you want to consistently talk about something else.
Page created in 0.649 seconds with 19 queries.