Law School Discussion

....

Re: MASTER LR LIST- 31 TO GO!
« Reply #90 on: June 12, 2006, 07:45:39 PM »
i fifth this

Saja

  • ****
  • 954
  • Into enemy territory...
    • View Profile
Re: MASTER LR LIST- 31 TO GO!
« Reply #91 on: June 12, 2006, 07:46:16 PM »
Ok, I'm trying to think of new questions, but my mind is addled.;)

On the "tough" LR there was a parallel reasoning Q which I think was #23.  The last answer choice was about a painter and his reputation, although that's not the one I put. I'm so sorry for how vague this is, lol, but maybe it will jog someone's memory.

Re: MASTER LR LIST- 31 TO GO!
« Reply #92 on: June 12, 2006, 07:48:33 PM »
It had to do with selling paintings and their price or something, but I don't remember the answer itself.

Re: MASTER LR LIST- 30 TO GO!
« Reply #93 on: June 12, 2006, 07:51:07 PM »
Fur coats question, principal
The couple picked the bottle of wine that they thought would impress people, even though their faborite tasted better and was cheaper
(I think this was the first question...but it may have been the first in the experiemental section)

Antilock breaks question, resolve
I picked the one about people who have antilock breaks not wearing seatbelts

Re: MASTER LR LIST- 30 TO GO!
« Reply #94 on: June 12, 2006, 07:51:47 PM »
Quote from: nixon plays checkers on Today at 09:03:41 PM
Quote from: nu07 on Today at 08:59:50 PM
Did anyone have a LR question about some woman who has to disclose her finances if she meets some two-part condition (like she has to either be on the board of some company as well as something else)?  I'm pretty sure that this was #25 of a 26 question section.  I think the answer had something to do with the fact that even though she doesn't meet the condition, she might have to disclose her finances anyway for some other reason.

I had this one.  *moves closer to the fax machine*  I'm not sure what I chose, do you remember any more of it?  It seemed like she didn't meet EITHER of the conditions set

She didn't but the idea was there could be OTHER reasons she'd have to disclose. If A or B she has to disclose. But what if C would force her to disclose (even if it was unstated). It didnt say A and B were the ONLY reasons.

Does anybody remember the question and answer in greater detail?

polkadot

Re: MASTER LR LIST- 30 TO GO!
« Reply #95 on: June 12, 2006, 07:52:21 PM »
If I remember correctly, the one involving paintings and prices was a parallel reasoning question, and the stem had to do with an ironic situation where allocating harsher penalties for crimes could sometimes result in less deterrence because juries become less willing to convict. I can't remember the other answer choices though.

I also put the seatbelt one.

Re: MASTER LR LIST- 30 TO GO!
« Reply #96 on: June 12, 2006, 07:52:59 PM »
Fur coats or whatever was in experimental. For ABS, I also put the seatbelt one.

For the disclosure question, I put "There is no other reason besides her association that would require her disclosure" or something.

Harper

  • ****
  • 223
  • works every time
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: MASTER LR LIST- 30 TO GO!
« Reply #97 on: June 12, 2006, 07:53:07 PM »
Fur coats question, principal
The couple picked the bottle of wine that they thought would impress people, even though their faborite tasted better and was cheaper
(I think this was the first question...but it may have been the first in the experiemental section)

Antilock breaks question, resolve
I picked the one about people who have antilock breaks not wearing seatbelts

Fur coats and wine - I think - are both exp.  But anti-lock breaks is right on.  I said the same about the seatbelts.  Not a great answer, but the other ones sucked.

Re: MASTER LR LIST- 30 TO GO!
« Reply #98 on: June 12, 2006, 07:53:55 PM »
For the parallel question about criminal sentencing, I put the one that had to do with a new medical procedure to treat a disease not saving more lives.

LSATisKillingMe

  • ***
  • 59
  • I want my score
    • View Profile
Re: MASTER LR LIST- 30 TO GO!
« Reply #99 on: June 12, 2006, 07:54:00 PM »
I put A for that Mary question... because it said something about computer technicians (or some computer whatever) are getting a good salary... therefore at least some employees are getting good salaries... it went from specific to general... just like mary's classmates... it went from gardners to persons... i think... (but I had a little to drink now)