Law School Discussion

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10
81
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by cinnamon synonym on April 05, 2016, 11:58:24 AM »
Maintain, have you given up on Hillary now that you see I was right that the FBI are going to interrogate hillary, huma and Cheryl?

Or do you think I made up that the FBI was going to interview her?

You seemed to be shocked now into silence...she may still have a chance but odds are that she was negligent. Agree?

No, it's just that nothing new has been added to the conversation. You're just repeating the same stuff, so there's nothing interesting to respond to.

You had questioned whether or not huma, Hillary and company will be interviewed and "heard" nothing about FBI activity.

I guess you now have read about the interviews regarding the criminal probe that is the latest news and is easily "sourced" now..

Sorry, I didn't think you acknowledged that interrogations were being scheduled.
82
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by loki13 on April 05, 2016, 07:23:04 AM »
Maintain, have you given up on Hillary now that you see I was right that the FBI are going to interrogate hillary, huma and Cheryl?

Or do you think I made up that the FBI was going to interview her?

You seemed to be shocked now into silence...she may still have a chance but odds are that she was negligent. Agree?

No, it's just that nothing new has been added to the conversation. You're just repeating the same stuff, so there's nothing interesting to respond to.

Don't feed the troll.
83
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by Maintain FL 350 on April 04, 2016, 08:49:36 PM »
Maintain, have you given up on Hillary now that you see I was right that the FBI are going to interrogate hillary, huma and Cheryl?

Or do you think I made up that the FBI was going to interview her?

You seemed to be shocked now into silence...she may still have a chance but odds are that she was negligent. Agree?

No, it's just that nothing new has been added to the conversation. You're just repeating the same stuff, so there's nothing interesting to respond to. 
84
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by cinnamon synonym on April 04, 2016, 08:42:25 PM »
Lets get this to 31000

Hillary📩 problem
85
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by cinnamon synonym on April 04, 2016, 08:37:49 PM »
Maintain, I will remind you that Brian pagliano was interviewed months ago

Yes, but what came of it? So far, nothing.

If there was some bombshell in Pagliano's testimony, don't you think the FBI would have acted on it by now?

Maintain, have you given up on Hillary now that you see I was right that the FBI are going to interrogate hillary, huma and Cheryl?

Or do you think I made up that the FBI was going to interview her?

You seemed to be shocked now into silence...she may still have a chance but odds are that she was negligent. Agree?
86
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by cinnamon synonym on April 03, 2016, 07:24:47 PM »
30138.

Hmmm.  With interrogations coming up the crowd is on edge.

Everyone knows that the FBI is wrapping up their criminal investigation into hillary clinton and sphe will probably be the last one to be interviewed; thus being the target of the criminal probe.

Can't imagine how many chinese hackers have her yoga positions (yeah, right) and us troop movements.

Whether it's negligence or stupidity clinton won't be president.



I'm amazed by how many times Loki checks this thread a week.
87
Online Law Schools / Re: Online PhD or LLD in Law
« Last post by legalpractitioner on April 01, 2016, 07:41:32 PM »
Well thanks anyway.
88
http://calbarjournal.com/April2016/TopHeadlines/TH5.aspx


Law schools required to disclose attrition rates

By Laura Ernde
Staff Writer

Unaccredited law schools in California will be required to report student attrition rates under a new rule approved last month by the State Bar Board of Trustees.

The State Bar’s Committee of Bar Examiners proposed the rule to provide greater transparency and effective disclosures to students. It will go into effect June 1. The committee oversees registered, unaccredited law schools in the state and accredited law schools in California that are not approved by the American Bar Association.

Unaccredited schools were already required to disclose in writing to current and prospective students a number of things including bar exam passage rates once a year, before the student pays tuition.

Now, students will be notified in writing of the school’s attrition rates for the past five years. A Los Angeles Times report last year found that about 85 percent of students at unaccredited schools don’t finish their studies.

Trustee Miriam Krinsky said the proposal will increase transparency.

“Consumers are entitled to know what the product is they’re purchasing,” she said.

Deans at several unaccredited schools said the high dropout rates do not tell the full story. Most students that go to unaccredited schools are working adults who may decide for various reasons not to continue their law studies.

“They typically have significant responsibilities outside school, such as families, careers, aging parents, etc.,” Northwestern California University School of Law Dean Michael P. Clancey said in a letter to the committee. “For many of them, life simply gets in the way of their plans for the study of law.”

Good refund policies are a better way to deal with high attrition rates, he said.

Trustee Brandon Stallings, who cast the lone vote against the proposal, said unaccredited schools provide opportunities in underserved areas of the state and expressed concern that the same disclosures are not required for California-accredited law schools.

The board requested that the committee study whether California-accredited law schools should also be required to disclose attrition rates.
89
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by cinnamon synonym on April 01, 2016, 07:41:56 AM »
After the FBI question hillarys staff regarding the evidence they have found I hope they offer Mrs. Clinton a reverse proffer and go easy on her so that she doesn't have to lie anymore.  She is probably tired of running from the law and hopefully ready to stop lying.

She wont have to say anything.....just listen to the evidence the FBI has against her and then cut her losses and  cut a deal..

No jail time.  Maybe Obama will pardon her. Maybe not.  Like Martha stewarts fate years ago hillarys  goose is cooked. ;)
90
removed
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10