Law School Discussion

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10
31
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by strumpet on November 16, 2016, 04:49:53 PM »
I have Julie blocked, but isn't remaking a party from a party of the people into their own image, the EXACT thing Hitler did with a party that started out basically just being a combination of Bernie Sanders and the NRA????????
32
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by Maintain FL 350 on November 15, 2016, 10:20:51 PM »
You fool.

Trump has indeed blown up the Republican party, and he will try to remake it in his own image. Anyone who opposes him will be destroyed by Breitbart and the rest of the alt-right media, and primaried out of existence. They will be replaced with loyalists who look to the man more than any policy.

Even better, there will be no Supreme Court to check his excesses, as he will likely replace at least two justices with his handpicked cronies.

And when he fails? No problem, plenty of scapegoats to blame. Mexicans, Muslims, Republicans. Whatever.

Listen Julie, I understand that you're ignorant and uneducated but it is pretty amazing to think that you went from a Democratic Socialist to an authoritarian mega-capitalist without even realizing the irony.

Oh, but I forgot! She had bad emails. Yes, a police state run by a Putinista will be much better.
33
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by cinnamon synonym on November 15, 2016, 09:10:47 PM »
Here is where you are politically naive, Maintain....

Our fuching federal government is one big bloated grift....it is corrupt and hillary clinton represents the top of the grift corrupt cesspool funds masquerading as charity foundations...

Trump is the answer to that because he is irreverent and doesn't take shite from anyone,... He is a loose cannon in many ways but he thought going into iraq and nation building was a stupid idea so I think he'll use more discretion than the media/polls. Er polls/media made him out to be..

We all know that clinton would be the riskier candidate in charge of our military and nuclear weapons because of her bad judgements with regard to Libya and iraq. Plus her super violent tantrums that she throws...her temperament is off center.

Not worried about trump and going to war I was worried about clinton who has a warmonger track record.

Sorry, just the facts....
34
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by cinnamon synonym on November 15, 2016, 09:03:30 PM »
76864
35
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by cinnamon synonym on November 15, 2016, 09:02:35 PM »
...sorry maintain, how could you support that disingenuous, two faced congenial liar, unaccomplished fake, phony, crooked, conniving, black people voice pandering, provincial hack, a-hole named hillary?
36
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by cinnamon synonym on November 15, 2016, 08:58:01 PM »
Please with your bull$#%t.

You guessed tails on a coin flip and got it right. You're not Nostradamus.

But yes, he won (although Clinton actually got more votes). I believed the polls and the polls were wrong.

And now we are stuck with a petulant know-nothing, a thin skinned ignoramus. Was Clinton a good choice? No, she was a train wreck. But Trump presents a risk (especially in terms of foreign policy) that is difficult to quantify.

I can understand being furious at the corruption, at the graft, at the nepotism, etc. I can't understand thinking that Trump is the answer. This was a monumentally bad choice.

And, ironically, Trump's election probably spells demographic doom for the Republican party. Between deporting people's parents and appointing justices who will overturn Roe, Republicans will lose millions of votes from women and Latinos.

Trump got 60 million votes (roughly the same as Romney), and Clinton will end up with something like 62 million. Obama got 65 million, and that is the real story here. Clinton was so compromised and unlikable that people simply didn't turn out.

Imagine Trump having to run against someone like Cory Booker in four years after driving away even greater numbers of voters.   

You just proved my above point and it is obvious that you dram
Nk the kool aide...
The Democratic Party is in shambles. The republicans just about control both branches plus the presidency...however the Republican Party is altered now...I'm excited to see jow it plays out and see what they will do.

In either case trump blew up both parties....
It was the season of disestablishmentarianism and change.

Clinton was a risk Trump represents visceral change..

Hey Maintain, you get exactly what you deserve for supporting that disingenuous congenial two faced ultra rich Scranton pa hack failure named hillary.

Bernie would be president now if you and many like you had not drunk the kool aide....think about it, I know you will.

But you still won't get that people didn't want the same shite....they want radical change.
37
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by Maintain FL 350 on November 15, 2016, 01:40:17 PM »
Please with your bull$#%t.

You guessed tails on a coin flip and got it right. You're not Nostradamus.

But yes, he won (although Clinton actually got more votes). I believed the polls and the polls were wrong.

And now we are stuck with a petulant know-nothing, a thin skinned ignoramus. Was Clinton a good choice? No, she was a train wreck. But Trump presents a risk (especially in terms of foreign policy) that is difficult to quantify.

I can understand being furious at the corruption, at the graft, at the nepotism, etc. I can't understand thinking that Trump is the answer. This was a monumentally bad choice.

And, ironically, Trump's election probably spells demographic doom for the Republican party. Between deporting people's parents and appointing justices who will overturn Roe, Republicans will lose millions of votes from women and Latinos.

Trump got 60 million votes (roughly the same as Romney), and Clinton will end up with something like 62 million. Obama got 65 million, and that is the real story here. Clinton was so compromised and unlikable that people simply didn't turn out.

Imagine Trump having to run against someone like Cory Booker in four years after driving away even greater numbers of voters.     
38
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by cinnamon synonym on November 15, 2016, 01:13:43 PM »
Wow.

Congratulations cinsyn, everyone else here stands corrected, you were right all along.

Thank you PD!

Why didn't Maintain and Loki admit they were YUGE Clinton supporters when they started discussing (like Maintain) and trolling (like Loki) on this thread.

How come they cant admit they were wrong about the FBI criminal investigation nor the fact that Clinton was never going to beat Rubio or Trump for that matter?

My hypothesis is that they are koolaide drinking Democrats who by into their own manure smell...
They wouldn't even give Bernie a chance.

Typically, the koolaide drinkers are in the deep dive and I bet half of them STILL cant believe that hiliary lost let alone that as soon as the FBI started the criminal investigation that the party was over....

Some like Maintain and Loki wake up thinking they are dreaming with this Trump presidency... if I had to bet on probables with rolling variables in my model. 8)

Loki and maintain will not admit that I predicted trumps win in Ohio, Florida, Michigan and Iowa....why is that PD?

Loki swore up and down that there was NO FBI criminal investigation into clinton....i think he still does....

It's denial right?
Or are they kooolaode drinkers.

Hell, I even pointed out most of the states Bernie was going to win.

Any thoughts?
39
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by cinnamon synonym on November 15, 2016, 08:42:39 AM »
Oh loki, it is you that are the troll in my thread....you don't see it
Waste if time explaining that to you.
Check the facts...eg who is the op?

Reagan democrats are Catholics who mostly vote democratic but in pa for example they did not....ypu dont see it.
Check the facts.

I am not in shock because I called Clintons demise from the get go.

The FBI criminal investigation and Clinton herself lying and evading I'd what cost her votes ALL over...particularly on Michigan...
Check the facts.
..

You, loki, stand corrected.
You were wrong and I was right about states Bernie would win and the states Clinton would lose..

And I was most right and you denied over and over and over again that the FBI IS conducting a criminal investigation..

Hey, your a sore loser.....go re read the record here, you troll....you hilliary duper.


 8)
40
Politics and Law-Related News / Re: POTUS
« Last post by loki13 on November 15, 2016, 06:55:04 AM »

My hypothesis was that Clinton wasn't going to be president ultimately was correct and if you re read what i wrote...

Your "hypothesis" changed so many times that it's not even funny. The reason you're a troll, and people stopped discussing any serious matters with you more than a half a year ago, is because you kept spouting out nonsensical information and refused to listen even when your multiple incorrect predictions were "incorrect." Well, that and the fact that you've previously trolled here before under a different name.

But saying that X candidate will lose, in a two-party system, is similar to saying a year ahead that "The NFC will lose the Superbowl." You have a decent chance of being correct, regardless of the reason. As you would know if you bothered to look at facts, a replacement-level GOP politician given the current underlying fundamentals following a two-term incumbent would have out-performed Trump. Trump did not "energize" people- he underperformed both Romney and McCain (he received fewer total votes even as the population has increased). Clinton already has won the "silent majority" of votes, and as votes continue to be counted in California, New York, and Washington, her popular vote total will increase - and come close to Obama's 2012 results.

The issue isn't at all what you are (and some pundits) are making it; instead, it's a combination of a misallocation of voters (urban, coastal) for the Democrats, and a misallocation of resources from the Clinton campaign. Millions of wasted votes in California and New York (to list two), Georgia and Texas becoming a lot bluer (but not nearly close enough), and Trump using the electoral college's structural advantage. All the time spent expanding the map and attempting to turn Florida and North Carolina, while no time was spent defending the Midwest, where Trump eked out the win. C'est la vie.

But for what it's worth- there is no such thing as a "Reagan Democrat" anymore. We call those Republicans, now. There are many lessons that can be drawn from this campaign, but they will all be lost on you. Now that the election is over, go away. Given your track record, I won't waste any more time engaged explaining things to you. This post is for the two or three other people that still look into this thread.

Hopefully, once you are doing whatever it is you do (assumedly, collecting your SSDI benefits), people will go back to posting on law-related issues.

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10