Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10
 21 
 on: November 19, 2014, 10:37:32 AM 
Started by I.M.D.Law - Last post by Citylaw
That probably makes sense, but it is still tough to distinguish. Notice by publication is always a remedy available, but I guess as Newspapers die out the internet is the better source to provide adequate notice

 22 
 on: November 18, 2014, 11:21:21 PM 
Started by I.M.D.Law - Last post by I.M.D.Law
Process servers won't be to happy about this. I don't know how I feel about it, many people are not to Facebook savy, and if proof of service by mail is often insufficient I don't understand how it can be done electornically, especially with all the technical glitches that might occur. Also, many people do not check their Facebook account daily or even weekly.
I believe this was reserved as a "last resort" by someone going out of their way not to be served (some people don't keep a steady address even for mail, but are addicted to facebook) And I think it was still done through a process serving company.

 23 
 on: November 18, 2014, 07:46:10 PM 
Started by I.M.D.Law - Last post by Citylaw
Process servers won't be to happy about this. I don't know how I feel about it, many people are not to Facebook savy, and if proof of service by mail is often insufficient I don't understand how it can be done electornically, especially with all the technical glitches that might occur. Also, many people do not check their Facebook account daily or even weekly.




 24 
 on: November 18, 2014, 06:25:09 PM 
Started by I.M.D.Law - Last post by Groundhog
To be fair, this probably should've been titled "via" Facebook. Facebook served many people prior to this... :P

 25 
 on: November 16, 2014, 11:31:26 AM 
Started by SmilingFish - Last post by derekwilson
jack24 is right. You should target the same type of place you'd like to practice law in.

 26 
 on: November 16, 2014, 07:40:20 AM 
Started by cusc2011 - Last post by cusc2011
The APR 3 rules was updated and made effective Jan 2014.  I don't know how long the Law Clerkship program been around in WA but the requirements are in APR 6.

 27 
 on: November 15, 2014, 08:42:07 PM 
Started by LSAT Blog - Last post by I.M.D.Law
 :o

 28 
 on: November 15, 2014, 08:41:25 PM 
Started by cusc2011 - Last post by I.M.D.Law
Is the clerking option new to that state? I didn't know they offered it.

 29 
 on: November 15, 2014, 02:24:37 PM 
Started by cusc2011 - Last post by cusc2011
Washington State amended their bar admission rules. The rules are clear and to the point. 

http://www.wsba.org/Licensing-and-Lawyer-Conduct/Admissions/Qualifications-for-taking-the-Bar-Exam


 30 
 on: November 15, 2014, 09:25:42 AM 
Started by LSAT Blog - Last post by LSAT Blog
Quote
A test prep company has been ordered to pay more than $900,000 in legal fees and costs to plaintiffs who accused the company of violating District of Columbia consumer protection laws.

Three prospective law students who signed up for LSAT prep courses through Test Masters Educational Services Inc. (TES) sued the company in 2004, claiming they were deceived into thinking they were enrolling in TestMasters, a competitor.

Details:

http://www.nationallawjournal.com/legaltimes/home/id=1202676131553/LSAT-Prep-Company-Ordered-to-Pay-927K-in-Legal-Fees?mcode=1202615432600&curindex=0&back=NLJ&slreturn=20141014120855

http://www.courthousenews.com/2014/11/13/victims-of-lsat-prep-fraud-nab-legal-fees.htm

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10