perversely name 3 things in the next 5 minutes that the No Child Left Behind law does and why they are bad policy prescriptions. Don't go look up moveon.orgs talking points either. Give me stuff fast. I doubt you even know much about NCLB, I did my thesis on it and will destroy you if you try to debate me. But to quote GW, Bring em on.
it says we need to:
2) not be held accountable for not testing
3) not change how all public schools learn
First of all as for the last 2, they are double negatives and i can hardly see how a positivist piece of legislation can include as policy perscriptions qua policy double negatives. and yes NCLB mandates testing. andy why shouldnt it mandate that we test. the public (you know the first word in the clause public school) in poll after poll supports using tests to gauge performance. would you then suggest that the public, the very public who funds these schools not be entitled to see what its tax dollars is generating in terms of accomplishments via accountability. lemme guess you would prefer more holistic arts and crafts style evaluative sh*t to determine performance. tests are a part of life. ever heard of the LSAT. It's a small test you might have heard of.
At the risk of being reported to the MOD's, becaue righties are so sensitive now. Your a pompous prick, I did my thesis on this and will destroy you, LMAO. Ever heard of the LSAT, pretentiousasshole!!