Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Julee Fern

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 33
21
Studying for the LSAT / Re: I hate cooley
« on: July 12, 2007, 12:55:02 AM »
i noticed a few other things too:

1) they use number of faculty as a factor, and they also use student-faculty ratio as a separate factor. what a bunch of crap, the only reason they used total # of faculty is because they have a ton of students and so they have to have a ton of faculty. i would be willing to bet a lot of money that the dudes who made the stupid ranking system knew that and purposely did that. oh and their student to faculty ratio is horrible, its like 24 to 1. idiots.

2) i was curious about their attrition rate so i went to the aba official guide and do you know what their FIRST year attrition rate is? TWENTY FIVE PERCENT!! close to 500 students drop out during the first year of law school. call me crazy, but that's bad. and that doesn't even include the 2nd, 3rd and 4th year attrition. granted, they aren't as bad, but still. the other thing is that half of those first year attrition people left for academic reasons!! so either the people that go there are morons and can't maintain good grades or the administration is so dumb that they use this crazy curving system and purposely fail out 1/8th of the class. i am seriously dumbfounded.

3) what makes it worse, is that they claim to be a top 16 school...or top 4 or whatever, i can't even keep it straight anymore.

edit: 4) their bar passage rate is like 50% too, if only half of your students pass the bar, you are not a top 20 school...

Isn't twenty-five percent 1/4?


As noted, there's apparently 25% (1/4) attrition (dropouts generally), with 1/2 of that (1/8th) academic attrition, or forced dropouts.

I've also heard that with 2nd / 3rd year attrition, only about 1/3 of entering students ever end up graduating. However, it's not clear how much of that is forced, and how much is simply people realizing the investment isn't worthwhile for them.

maybe they all think they brad pitt and go africa adopt child so can boink angelina jolie.


This is actually pretty funny.


julie make funny!   :D

22
Studying for the LSAT / Re: ENOUGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« on: July 12, 2007, 12:42:25 AM »
*lol*

Julie ride short bus! :D

and you definitely not blowing enough teachers.


Come on! We blow ALL teachers! >:(

maybe you should stop swallowing.


why should we stop swallowing?

that why teachers love us!   :)

23
Studying for the LSAT / Re: ENOUGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« on: July 11, 2007, 09:13:08 AM »
*lol*

Julie ride short bus! :D

and you definitely not blowing enough teachers.


Come on!  We blow ALL teachers!   >:(

24
Studying for the LSAT / Re: ENOUGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
« on: July 11, 2007, 09:04:21 AM »
i think people are too hard n that school.

they give people a chance that might never otherwise have one...


I agree.. but why do they have to try so hard with the ranking crap?.. It kinda makes them lose some of the credibility they really didn't have to begin with...

i agree

but, did they do that b4 or after people started making fun of them?


Honestly, no one ever heard of Cooley until they started claiming they were a top program with the rankings.

It's probably helped them gain nationwide publicity, with the flip side of the constant mockery.

just when julie think julie know you, you prove be even bigger idiot.

how community college going for you, anyway?


Is there a portion of my statement you can actually disagree with on a rational basis, or are you just talking to hear your own voice again? 

I'm amazed your special ed program gives you so much computer time.  Are you merely functionally retarded, or a full-blown mental deficient?


*lol* 

Julie ride short bus!   :D

25
Studying for the LSAT / Re: I hate cooley
« on: July 11, 2007, 08:51:48 AM »
julie think you people go cooley and members of one-joke club there.

such hoot!


*lol* :D

26
what kind drill you own?


yes, this real question!

27
So I don't get it. Is Julie Fern really debating herself for fun? Or did someone else create Julee Fern to mock the real Julie? It's funny. But odd.


One Fern is witty, intelligent, and deft of word and step. The other Fern is tedious, lacks humour, and presents evidence of petty obsession and vindictiveness.


Odd? Yes, very.


Thanks for compliment, and you're largely right about alter-ego, but still kinda mean.

28
So I don't get it.  Is Julie Fern really debating herself for fun?  Or did someone else create Julee Fern to mock the real Julie?  It's funny.  But odd.


We're the same person.  I guess it's kind of strange, but hardly anyone spoke to me before.  At least this way I have someone to talk with.

29
not mock handicapped, even though you one of us.


Long as you realize we same person. You starting to scare me!

30
Studying for the LSAT / Re: How to find "serious" post on LSD
« on: June 26, 2007, 07:45:02 PM »
urp.

julie say urp.

I find serious post!!!!!!

son, you not find own pecker without help.


Jay say Julie expert at finding pecker. :)

not worry, nurses be in see you soon.


That true, it time for our pennicillin shot.   :(

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 ... 33