Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - burr33

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]
61
Waiting for your LSAT score is not as bad as waiting...


for your STD test results.

62
Studying for the LSAT / SCORES ARE IN...
« on: June 20, 2005, 04:09:58 PM »
...my pants.

ban me please.

63
Studying for the LSAT / Re: RC Tortoise Question is Thrown Out!!!!!
« on: June 19, 2005, 08:00:06 PM »
I'm fairly certain the Job answer response briefly explained the Job story anyways.  You shouldn't have needed outside information.  Either way, the correct answer reponse was Tortoise.

64
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Poll for June Takers
« on: June 18, 2005, 06:58:49 PM »
175-180: awesome
173-174: extremely happy, but not surprised
170-172: likely
168-169: dissapointed but doable
165-168: pissed
120-164: slit my wrists

65
X3Maverick:
Funny thing is, I haven't seen you give a correct justification for any question.  Getting a little nervous?

66
1.  ??
2.  172
3.  155 (took this blind, meaning I didn't even know what kind of questions were on the test)
4.  2 month course
5.  nothing is difficult, games are definitely the most learnable.
6.  1360 (710 math/ 650 verbal), SAT IIs 760 math IIc, 710 chem, rest ?, APs 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 3
7.  I'm a good test taker when I try.  SATs i didnt really try, APs I tried.  LSAT is more based on pure intelligence than other standardized tests.  In my opinion, it really separates the book smart (high GPAs, low LSAT) from the ones with the more ability.
8. take a good course, testmasters or blueprint

67
Sorry, I kind of was asking my own question.  Just something I was confused about.  Didn't mean to upset anyone.

68
I'm not getting why people keep thinking there were expiremental LR questions.  I thought everyone had expiremental Reading or Games sections (section 2). Am I wrong?

69
Studying for the LSAT / Re: question about last game
« on: June 08, 2005, 03:40:02 PM »
M has to be with P (or the other way around) was definitely at least one of the answer choices.  This was basically testing to see if you made the key deduction: M or P has to be in all 3 subgroups.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]