Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - bobwil50

Pages: 1 [2]
11
Studying for the LSAT / The Official Stone-Bread Poll
« on: June 06, 2005, 08:38:42 PM »
Since no one can agree on this one, let's take a vote!

12
Studying for the LSAT / No horror story to report
« on: June 06, 2005, 06:22:20 PM »
With all the LSAT horror stories freaking out future test-takers, I would just like to say that my experience was fine: the room temperature was normal, the proctors were competent, and the distractions were a minimum.

Sorry to anyone that is envious.

13
Studying for the LSAT / Hardest Question on the Test
« on: June 06, 2005, 05:05:21 PM »
So what is everyone's opinion of which question was the hardest question on the test?

I pick the stone-bread whatever anaolgy for the Japanese RC passage.

There seems to be quite a diversity of answers on here for that one.

14
Studying for the LSAT / Earplugs for LSAT?
« on: June 01, 2005, 11:06:29 PM »
Would there be any drawbacks to wearing earplugs during the test in order to filter out distractions?

15
Studying for the LSAT / What you will you be doing on Monday?
« on: June 01, 2005, 07:06:17 PM »
There are a couple different ways you can express what you are doing on Monday.  Which one do you use?

16
Studying for the LSAT / Food for thought
« on: May 27, 2005, 10:56:43 PM »
Found this as I was stumbling around the net.  Any thoughts?

"The LSAT is also a test that, as it stands, I have no major beefs with. Iím sure that, like all tests, it could be better. But I believe that the LSAT does a credible job of testing the baseline, content-unspecific skills I would want a lawyer to have: the ability to sidestep rhetoric and read in a purely denotative manner, to reframe abstract situations in concrete terms, to manipulate and analyze information under pressure, to recognize assumptions and basic logical fallacies, to make analogies between superficially dissimilar situations, and perhaps most importantly, to pay close attention to material that, at that particular moment in time, they wouldn't normally be even the slightest bit interested in."

http://www.numbertwopencil.net/articles/misslsat/missinglsats1.html

17
Studying for the LSAT / LR, Prep Test 26, Section 3, #24
« on: May 26, 2005, 06:22:11 AM »
Can you guys help me out with this one:

Over the last 25 years, the average price paid for a new car has steadily increased in relation to average individual income.  This increase indicates that individuals who buy new cars today spend, on average, a larger amount relative to their incomes buying a car than their counterparts did 25 years ago.

Which one of the following, if true, most weakens the argument?

A)There has been a significant increase over the last 25 years in the proportion of individuals in households with more than one wage earner.
B)The number of used cars sold annually is the same as it was 25 years ago.
C)Allowing for inflation, average individual income has significantly declined over the last 25 years.
D)During the last 25 years, annual new-car sales and the population have both increased, but new-car sales have increased by a greater percentage.
E)Sales to individuals make up a smaller proportion of all new-car sales than they did 25 years ago.

Pages: 1 [2]