Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - hilljack

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 157
91
As far as the performing duty unless there is overwhelming evidence that harm will come, I think the reporter answer is right.  This has been debated on this or another thread.  The reporter holds of on reporting to the police the possibility of a terrible crime or atrocity because he does not have significant evidence.  I think his decision conformed exactly to the principle.  I think the teacher answer required further assumptions about the disastrous consequences part of the principle.


I distinctly remember the reporter answer saying that there was a "slim chance" someone would be harmed, but the principle stated there must be "overwhelming evidence."  I went with the teacher/internship, too.

Yes, it did say that there was a slim chance, and the reporter conformed to his duty because there was only a slim chance, I think it said he 'held off on reporting it to the police'

92
Studying for the LSAT / Re: List of Reading Comp Questions
« on: June 09, 2005, 01:09:17 PM »
i remember the "females mate ONLY with the fastest male" as an incorrect answer to the inference question, but i dont think that was a choice for the detail/except question.  i'll add it to the list anyway as a debated answer choice.

I agree, it seems like all the answers to that were short.  I also recollect the females only mate with fastest... as an incorrect answer to an inference question, perhaps the one that the AC was something about the Prolonges being faster than they need to be to escape any current predator.

93
I think it should be among the 'debated answers' on the list

94
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR-legislators right to free expression
« on: June 09, 2005, 01:00:48 PM »
No, this is the history question

95
No, the principle said that the duty should be performed unless overwhelming evidence of terrible things.

The reporter performed the duty to stay confinential because the evidence of terrible things was limited.

96
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR-legislators right to free expression
« on: June 09, 2005, 12:53:34 PM »
Yes, I put that, but now I think it was wrong.

97
As far as the performing duty unless there is overwhelming evidence that harm will come, I think the reporter answer is right.  This has been debated on this or another thread.  The reporter holds of on reporting to the police the possibility of a terrible crime or atrocity because he does not have significant evidence.  I think his decision conformed exactly to the principle.  I think the teacher answer required further assumptions about the disastrous consequences part of the principle.

Also, I remember a question about plagiarism or copying a writing style on Monday’s test.  Could have been the experimental though.

98
Studying for the LSAT / Re: List of Reading Comp Questions
« on: June 08, 2005, 06:02:37 PM »
agree

99
Studying for the LSAT / Re: List of Reading Comp Questions
« on: June 08, 2005, 05:58:32 PM »
I am almost sure 22 was a main point and the answer was something like a legal rule is used in a way it was not initially thought to be able to be used - wording not exact  ;)

100
Studying for the LSAT / Re: List of Reading Comp Questions
« on: June 08, 2005, 05:51:15 PM »
I think the point was that other fossil remains were not used as evidence of relict behavior.

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 12 13 14 15 ... 157