yeah, i just recieved an email with an updated financial aid package which now includes a $8,000 "diversity scholarship". I wonder if its renewable or just a one time thing.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I noticed that private loans require credit worthiness. I went on to the web page of the suggested lender for my school and they said that creditworthiness is based primarily on your credit score. My credit score is pretty low (20th percentile), in part because I have lots of loans from my undergrad. Does anyone know what the credit score cutoff is for "good credit?" Has anyone been turned down and if so, do they know their credit score?
Congrats. I was also accepted with "honors at entrance" and 12K. You have to remain in the top third of your class, though; I have a friend at MSU who has a scholarship contingent on maintaining a GPA of 3.0. She has a 3.1 and that does not put her in the top half of her school. So I plan on going next week and grilling them on the number of awards they offered, what their grade distribution is, etc.
Don't get me wrong man, I'm by no means an admissions expert, but I can't imagine you getting turned down by Texas with a 4.0 and a 170 on the LSAT, plus with your EC's. With that, I figure the only way you'd get left out is if you apply late when most of the seats are filed, or if you just spend no time on your application.
Don't get me wrong Pancho (by the way, Willie is the man!), I'm not trying to tell you what to do. But the fact is, at least through my eyes, is that witha 4.0 and a 170+ on the LSAT, you have a great shot at even Harvard, Stanford, and Yale.
Your numbers are simply so good it will be tough for anyone to reject you.
Moreover, you should try to go above 170 on the LSAT. If you can do that, (say 175 or so) then all of a sudden you aren't talking about just getting admitted, you're probably getting some scholarship money as well.
Best of luck to you. Apparently you've worked hard, and it should begin to pay off some; just don't let up now.
Well that truly, truly srinks and a 155/3.3.....and WAITLISTED at MC? Damn...I got a 3.3/156 and am sending mine in on 10/1....I bet Im screwed, huh?
What? With a 3.3/161 you think you are overqualified for a T2? Am I misinterpreting your statement? If that kind of cocky attitude came through in your PS at all, neither your WL at Houston or your ding from OK surprise me at all.
This brings me to an important point that I've been thinking about for awhile. (Note: none of what follows is directed at anyone in particular.) Everyone loves to talk about their soft-factors in terms of giving them a boost. Everyone thinks that they are the world's best writer with the world's best WE and ECs and the strongest LORs from the most influential people. What is rarely mentioned is the fact that your soft-factors can be used just as easily to reject you despite your numbers. For instance, being obnoxious about your qualifications could easily get you rejected (especially if they aren't even all that impressive). As another example, say you got a great GPA from a crappy run-of-the-mill LAC and a mid-160s LSAT. By the numbers, it would appear you should get into low T1 schools easily. Perhaps your high GPA belies the fact that you are actually a pretty poor writer. Maybe your PS was complete garbage. Maybe you didn't really want to go to school X and never presented a compelling reason for the adcoms to believe that you actually wanted to go there. Maybe you are a world-class prick and one of your LORs was less than flattering.
The point is, you can't tell any of these things just by looking at someone's LSN profile. So before you start plucking LSN profiles (which are of questionable veracity, anyway) and making broad assessments about affirmative action, and individual's worthiness of admission, remember "this persons might write on a 6th grade level."
If you read his explanation, you'll see that his GPA includes 9 F's from a bad first year, which he managed to bring up. Nevertheless, his index score puts him in the auto-admit range for Houston. Still, I have no way of knowing why he got rejected. The point I was making is that his race hurt him. I'm speculating that if he were black, UH would have given him way more slack. More generally, I was arguing that many of the people who are being waitlisted would be admitted if they were URM. Of course, a few of them are URM, but they generally have lower numbers than others waitlisted. One of the guys waitlisted does present a counter-example to my argument:
Again, all this goes to my point that UH was not "full" at the time of my original post. Even as we approach April, my bet is that they still have plenty of slots for the people they want to attract.