Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - katesq

Pages: 1 2 [3]
21
i am considering going to tj for the mad scholarship for a year. how hard do you think it would be to transfer to usc or ucla?

22
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR: tv computer one.
« on: February 14, 2005, 10:53:44 AM »
i was half asleep when i wrote the first post. i kept mixing things up. sorry.

23
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR: tv computer one.
« on: February 14, 2005, 10:36:33 AM »
no,the statements in the passage were 1. tv is the major form of entertainment. 2.the majority of households own tvs or something. 3. computers are new and people don't like new things. 4. computers will NOT make tv obselete. then the question said which one WEAKENS the idea that computers will NOT make tv obselee.

the fact that people own both strengthens the idea that computers will not make tv obselete.

24
Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR: tv computer one.
« on: February 14, 2005, 05:24:14 AM »
when i first read thisthread i got worried. but now i remember:

I think it was everything strengthens the idea that computers will not take over and make televison obsolete, except

but the stimulus also said something like tv is the major form of entertainment...so computers will not take over.itwas a weakens question so consider the following:

people owning tvs and computers strengthens the idea that tv is the major form of entertainment and computers will not take over (otherwise they would have abondoned their tvs)

Computers offer more entertainment options-and yet television is till the major form of entertainment

Declining price- people continue to buy tvs even if computer prices are declining (but not neccesarily cheaper than)compared to computers.

so it has to be that televisions were once new weakens the argument that computers will not take over as the major form of entertainment. one of the premises of the argument was that people did not like new things.

Pages: 1 2 [3]