Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - weinmatt

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]
41
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Official "Estimate Your Feb LSAT Score" Thread
« on: February 12, 2005, 03:32:21 PM »

Pretty damn similar to me...  may we both end up with 170s!

I don't know what it is about LR, but I can never tell how I did when I finish them.  I know for sure that I got one wrong, but past that I have no clue.  I usually get 0-2 per section.  If it wasn't for being 99.99% sure that I aced the games section I'd feel uncomfortable about my performance...

May we both! But actually, if we look at the Dec. scale and just add one to all the raw scores... we're looking between 169-172. Big difference!

42
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Official "Estimate Your Feb LSAT Score" Thread
« on: February 12, 2005, 03:17:31 PM »
First off... the october 2004 is scaled that way most likely because it was easier than usual. I think we can agree that this is not the case here....

but anyhow for the sake of the argument...
0-1 on the games
3-4 on each LR
and 3-4 on the CR

so... 87 raw or 167-170... I'll take that!

43
Studying for the LSAT / Re: 5th section...LR
« on: February 12, 2005, 02:58:11 PM »
and the right answer was something like small eyes contributes to poor vision? i can't remember -- but i think it was the one that made sense because there was no link between small eyes and poorvision in the paragraph?

44
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Which were the real games?
« on: February 12, 2005, 01:47:55 PM »
they can see cancellations, also, did any of you find one of the LR sections to be REALLY wordy

45
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Which were the real games?
« on: February 12, 2005, 01:45:49 PM »
somebody said they thought the first was experimental... looks like they were right

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5]