Barbri gives you everything you need for the bar exam. Unless you want these books as a keepsake of some sort, you will have no future need for any of them once you graduate.
"Nothing you can do is going to help much."
So my doom is unavoidable? I should just welcome it with open arms?
I am at Franklin Pierce Law Center (Tier 3) which is known nationally for their IP program (top 5). My goal is to work in the southeast, which includes the DC area.
At FPLC I am in the top 10%, on law review, a legal skills TA, and I was awarded the 2008 Dean's Achievement Award.
My question is, should I stay at FPLC or go to GW and leave all of my accomplishments at FPLC behind (as well as the award money for the Award)?
Please help, I have no idea what to do.
Define 'ruckus'. Because asking the waitress if there was a mistake isn't a ruckus. The waitress escalated it to a manager, with whom Rick spoke. This is also not a ruckus.
There was no hissyfit. There was no ruckus. Your 'hate' is self-created. And deplorable.
Wow...so do you always think EVERYTHING EVERYONE says is 100% true and accurate? There's 2 sides to every story, and you know only what "ricky" wrote about it. It's very likely that how he remembers and reports the story isn't exactly accurate.
It's nice to see that assuming someone behaves reasonable is stupid and assuming people behave unreasonably is perfectly okay.
I don't think EVERYTHING people say is true and accurate, but I'm willing to give people the benefit of the doubt. Apparently, that sort of thing is looked down on around here. Instead, what appears to be a majority of LSD regulars seem to believe that we should be highly suspicious of an LSD members story and automatically beleive something else to be true without any information from the other parties.
For the record, the restaurant's waitress and manager did not behave too far outside of the norm. Having run restaurants for about a decade and trained more manager than I can count with my hands and feet, I can tell you that this sounds like a pissy waitress and an untalented, undertrained manager. This sort of thing happens all the time, every day, across the country. Waitresses either know or don't know the proper way to deal with a complaint like this. This one clearly did not, as she indicated that she was going to see what she could do and clearly ran straight to a manager to tell him that she wasn't dealing with it. The manager then behaved as many young, inexperienced and undertrained managers do - he argued, proved to the customer how right he was, then in the end did what the customer wanted anyway (which, by the way, appears to be the only thing he did correctly).
That said, the proper procedure (or best practice) in this situation is to apologize for the miscommunication (the waitress not pointing out the upcharge), show the customer that the menu does state the charge, tell the customer that you will take it off the bill this time, thank the customer for the business, then train the waitress to inform her customers when an upcharge is necessary for a substitution. That way the customer is happy, the waitress gets training, and you've earned repeat business.
I've had people yell at me over a few missing peas in a recipe where there was no peas. Instead of making the customer feel stupid, I apologized, explained that our recipe was likely different than what they thought they were ordering, and comped his meal. He came back frequently and we never had a problem again.
I've said it before and I'll say it again - as a former GM I WANT my customers to tell me if they feel any aspect of their meal was less than positive. You cannot improve unless you hear what you do wrong. Your customers are your best source for this. While I have had people flip out over what appears to be no big deal, my staff, from busboy to me, were all very good at turning the situation around from a negative to a positive. The way this was handled was wrong from start to finish. Should Rick have read the menu more carefully to see if there was an upcharge? Perhaps. Am I willing to condemn him for it? No. The waitress could have prevented this situation by informing him when he ordered that there was an upcharge for substitutions. When I was a waiter and someone ordered a well done steak, I would tell them that we can't guarantee that it will be good because well done, culinarily speaking, means overcooked. If they wanted it well done, I'd still give it to them but try to warn them that it may be dry and take longer to cook. That way, they couldn't complain that their meal took a long time to get to them or that it was dry.
Perhaps it's the optimist in me, but I prefer to hear someone's story and assume they are telling me the truth. I'm sure Rick left small things out, but I can't believe that he would be the sort of person to lose it, yell about things, throw a fit, or be completely unreasonable. And I wouldn't expect him to leave that part out if he had.
That's the thing about Rick - if you read enough of what he writes, you can get a sense about him. Most of you haven't bothered to read anything he's written and have chosen to make snap judgments based on your own angry little perceptions. Perhaps you feel that this is how attorney's behave, that they are judgmental pricks who decide the truth based on their perceptions instead of the facts presented. Most professors find a way to politely remind these sort of people to consider only the facts, as presented, as being truthful and accurate and warn them not to interject their own beliefs, experience and values into the problem at hand. Since so few of you have bothered to get to know anything about Rick, I find it a little disturbing that you feel that you are in a position to judge his behaviors based on what you think you know.
Keep on drinking the haterade. It makes you all seem so smart and wise and in no way makes you appear stupid, shallow, or insipid.
There's unethical and then there's stuff that could get you kicked out of school and in Honor Court.
This is one of the things that could land you in front of whatever Honor Council you have. At most schools, law review isn't really considered an extracurricular and if you do something "unethical" with the law review competition it's often the same as doing something "unethical" on an exam.