Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - whiteytighty

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
General Board / Re: Ruebenson
« on: April 24, 2006, 06:03:50 PM »
lolla, the issue is not just this "old fart," ALL criminals should be punished and rot in jail!

2
St. John's U Law School / Re: ST. JOHN'S PART TIME EVENING PROGRAM
« on: April 24, 2006, 05:57:06 PM »
St. John's is old-fashioned, but in good ways. For example, professors' continued reliance on the Socratic method is challenging, to be sure, but also stimulating and a great incentive to always read carefully! However, St. John's could benefit from more classes about research and writing, which is the most important skill a lawyer can have. The law school facilities are excellent, clean, convenient, and efficiently designed. and the building is "immaculate", there's a great library, and plenty of room for students to study and socialize. If you are planning to practice in New York City, St. John's is an excellent place to do it, as the school has a strong regional reputation and extensive contacts in the legal community. In particular, St. John's alumni are a fantastic resource to students.

3
As someone who slept with both Dorothy and Matt, I'd have to say I didn't learn much of anything new from either one, but Matt insists on cuddling afterward when you're ready to split, and

oh, sorry, wrong thread.

4
Studying for the LSAT / Re: IM SCARED FOR THE LSAT
« on: June 04, 2005, 11:10:54 PM »
Julie Fern has a new avatar already?


Julie Fern changes his avatar more often than he changes his underwear.

5
Studying for the LSAT / Re: i NEED to VOLUNTEER or something.
« on: March 18, 2005, 03:15:19 AM »
Law school admissions people especially like to see Paris Hilton types to whom it would never occur to volunteer for any damn thing until they decided they could get something out of it.

6
Studying for the LSAT / Re: An idea for this anxiety.
« on: March 03, 2005, 08:25:04 PM »
Personally, I'd like to see ekc364 and Xony get together.  At least, the video.

7
To answer the original question, I understand it's betterto say one's ethnicity than not to. I know a student who's now left Boalt  but who was on the adcom, and who said that they preferred to have race and income fully filled in, even if it appeared the applicant is white and financially/socially privileged. According to her, at least this way the person was coming out with who they were and weren't hiding, which is seen as more suspect in her opinion.
I thought it was interesting at the time.


It's even more interesting that Boalt is asking applicants about their race so many years after Prop. 209 passed.

8
WE, AFRICAN-AMERICANS, DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE NOR CLAIM WARD CONNERLY.  HE IS AN EMBARRASSMENT TO OUR RACE.  WE ARE INSULTED BY ANY POSTING OF HIM TO BLACK HISTORY MONTH WHEN HE DENIES HIS OWN HERITAGE AND GOES AGAINST EVERYTHING THAT BLACK HISTORY AND OUR ANCESTORS ARE ABOUT AND HAVE WORKED SO HARD TO ACCOMPLISH.


There goes my Clarence Thomas bio idea...

9
Affirmative Action / Re: AFF AXN questions for the uninformed
« on: February 07, 2005, 12:09:57 AM »
This topic is not supposed to be heated or emotional! I just have some basic questions that I would like answered.  Call me dumb about the topic, but don't call me mean!  ;D

AFF AXN Definition:
A policy or a program that seeks to redress past discrimination through active measures to ensure equal opportunity, as in education and employment.

1) If I was rejected from an Ivy for undergrad even though I have the same scores as an URM that was accepted to the same Ivy, and I now attend an average public undergrad..then isnt that a form of discrimination...and shouldnt I be given an advantage ("to redress past discrimination") over that URM when I apply to Graduate programs?

2) Must each individual that recieves affirmative action prove a specific example of when someone previously discriminated against them?

3) Does attending the same University not provide an equal opportunity? How can affirmative action persist past undergrad (i totally understand this effort to provide people from different socioeconomic backgrounds the same opportunity)? And if it does, then shouldn't it only exist to even the playing field between Harvard Graduates and Random Community College graduates?

Again, nothing hateful...only clarification please :)!


You need to understand the difference between two supposed justifications for race preferences:

1) remedy past discrimination.  Back in the 1960's, when segregation was recent, race preferences were justified by saying, blacks were disenfranchised, etc., so they need a leg up.  This rationale obviously loses its force by the nineties, when decades after segregation was made illegal, there are no more college applicants (of the usual age) that have themselves endured government-sponsored inequality.  Obviously, the vestiges of all that went before continue to have their effect in terms of economic and social conditions, but the old-George-Wallace-barring-the-classroom-door days are long gone.

2) but when that rationale started to lose its force, proponents of race preferences took to heart the concept adopted by US Supreme Court Justice Powell (alone among his brethren) in the 1978 Bakke case, that race preferences could be justified by the concept of diversity, all by itself; you didn't need to show that an individual had him- or herself suffered from discrimination; diversity meant that the unique contribution that someone with a different background makes to an institution is enough.  In other words, even if (hypothetically) there were no discrimination against minorities still existent, you still wouldn't want to have nothing but nordic types in a truly vibrant campus, you need all sorts of people so that true understanding and sharing of ideas takes place.

And that remains the prevailing rationale for race preferences in the US today.

10
Affirmative Action / Re: Do asians benefit from AA?
« on: February 06, 2005, 04:17:51 PM »
Gonna apply to LS next year, and i was just wondering if Asians benefit/gain an advantage from AA?




Of course not! 

Everybody knows that Asians don't suffer from extreme language/cultural differences, outright racism, housing discrimination, or other estrangements from the racist white majority power structure.

In fact, if you are looking at the West Coast, in particular, Asians tend to have to meet an even higher standard than wasp students, since they are viewed as "over-represented" minorities.

Before Prop. 209, the medians for admission at Berkeley et al. were significantly tougher for asians.

Pages: [1] 2 3