Discussion
Resources
71
Studying for the LSAT / Test #30 Dec. LSAT Sct. 4 Q. 6
« on: January 10, 2005, 11:32:12 PM »
Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.
The reasoning in the commissioner's argument is flawed becasue this argument:
a) relies on information that is far from certain
b) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution
c) inappropriately relies on the opinion of experts
d) inappropriately employs language that is vague
e) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds
The correct answer is b, but I chose answer choice e. Does anyone understand why b is the better choice?
The reasoning in the commissioner's argument is flawed becasue this argument:
a) relies on information that is far from certain
b) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution
c) inappropriately relies on the opinion of experts
d) inappropriately employs language that is vague
e) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds
The correct answer is b, but I chose answer choice e. Does anyone understand why b is the better choice?
