Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Ivy_Hopeful

Pages: 1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 [49]
481
Easy the one that does better gets recruited

Example> if Mr. A goes to Harvard and does not perform well like you said (has to be very bad)

and Mr. B goes to U of New Mexico and performs top 10% than the recruting will go to the U of NM grad

Keep in mind this only works in extremes because if Mr. A does ok or under par but not worst the repuatation of Harvard will overpower performance.  Plus with places like Harvard you get more geographical range on where to practice law because of its reputation. Hope this helps.  

482
General board for soon-to-be 1Ls / Re: Ebay auction for law school books
« on: August 12, 2003, 03:49:27 PM »
Wrong forum there buddy boy/girl

483
General board for soon-to-be 1Ls / Re: Executors of Wills
« on: August 17, 2003, 01:50:06 AM »
I do agree with blohard, that only those people that can lawfully practice the law in a certain jurisdiction should answer legal questions.  In other words those whom have passed the (MBE) multi-state bar exam in that location.

484
General board for soon-to-be 1Ls / Re: Executors of Wills
« on: August 12, 2003, 03:34:36 PM »
Laura,
I would help but unfortunately you posted this question on the wrong forum, you should consult the Law Shool students and graduates, especially in the subject of contracts and wills.  Plus look in the yellow pages that should reveal at least half a dozen of well qualified attourneys that specialize in contracts and the like. Hope this helps.

485
General board for soon-to-be 1Ls / Re: gpa conventions
« on: August 18, 2003, 11:39:01 AM »
Thank you, that clears alot up. My understanding of the Canadian GPA system has become much better  ;D

486
General board for soon-to-be 1Ls / Re: gpa conventions
« on: August 12, 2003, 03:44:24 PM »
i/m going to go with 3.4 GPA (US) is equivelant to 85th percentile (Canadian 85%) just do this math plug in numbers to equate to 85% of 100

3.4 / 4 = 85% (in other words)

3.4 (plugged in for x) divided by 4 (the perfet GPA 4.0) equals 85%

That is assuming what Andrew assumes is that it is raw number math othewise consult a CAnadian undergrad for this answer if it is different than the obvious. Right Andrew?

Does this clarify things keyguy?

487
General board for soon-to-be 1Ls / Re: Should I Re-take LSAT or just apply?
« on: September 04, 2003, 06:26:11 PM »
Grace,
Yes Yes and Yes...

The answers to whether or not you could get into those top programs. Although LSAT is weighted over GPA in many many cases, your GPA is a marathon that you gracefully (no pun intended) perfected. And as opposed to the sprint of the all important "test" your GPA will not go overlooked when it comes to admissions desicions you have something over many other applicants. There are (believe it or not) many applicants whom have scored 180's on their LSAT's and a seldom amount whom have recieved a 4.0 UGPA. Be proud apply and your LSAT (which is good by the way) will communicate your ambitions and aspirations combined with your entire profile (everything ELSE used in the admission's process. One last thing to mention. Remember that the very top law schools (arguably the top 10)  look at everyhting initally not after the first cut like most others (numbers cut) becasue they have many whom have near perfect-perfect numbers they will scutinize a 180 applicant with a 3.4 GPA over a 16oish applicant with a 4.0. Hope this helps good luck to you Grace,
                                                   --- Ivy_Hopeful

488
FL,
 I would seriously think about the consequences to retaking the LSAT.  First of all, you may do worse the second time and your overall average will go down, and secondly, although you may do better some law schools look down upon a retest unless you have a valid reason for doing bad the first time.  SO unless you can justify taking it again DON'T!  

489
General board for soon-to-be 1Ls / Re:  Application Fee Waivers
« on: September 06, 2003, 06:34:18 PM »
This is an unfortunate occurance and this is sad but true.  I disagree with this approach. In fact the ultimate irony is that many of the top 20 schools admissions comittees and directors have spoken out against the "unfair ranking system" but sure enough in their catalogs they use the "Once unfair raning system" to compare themsleves or pat each other on the back for thier schools historical accomplishments, in a word, lame, covers my response as well.  ::)

490
You too, thanks for the information  ;D

Pages: 1 ... 44 45 46 47 48 [49]