Law School Discussion

Nine Years of Discussion
;

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Matthew_24_24

Pages: 1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 [58]
571
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Bah, screw it.
« on: October 23, 2004, 07:32:44 PM »
I wouldn't mind arc, going over the LR i didn't find any of it especially hard, i just got caught up in assumptions (like the ice age question on LR I) where the northern canada response (c) really caught my eye, i apparently glossed over D.  I really do have trouble with some of the questions though...the freud question really stumped me before i knew the right answer.

And game 4 on AR still scares the *&^% out of me...although my inability to do game 3 is puzzling, it was not hard at all.  sigh.

Matt

572
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Bah, screw it.
« on: October 23, 2004, 07:29:57 PM »
I now just deleted all my pr0n on my computer...purging is helpful.  Now time to make a list of those ive lied to (if i can find the guts) in real life and make some amends.  Obviously, this will be harder than on here...but at least here is a start.

Matt

573
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Bah, screw it.
« on: October 23, 2004, 07:27:15 PM »
Omg, that actually brought my eyes tear up.  I'm glad more people are like you and not like me.  I'll try, i hope i dont get as nervous this time. 

574
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Bah, screw it.
« on: October 23, 2004, 07:21:47 PM »
Wow, nice convenient "lie detector" ads from google below my posts. argh!

Matt

575
Studying for the LSAT / Bah, screw it.
« on: October 23, 2004, 07:18:14 PM »
I'm a f-ing liar, always have been and may always will be.  However, I am going to attempt to change this around.  I don't know if it's possible, but oh well. 

a) My practice scores were not in the low 170's. I ranged from 164-171, not 168-174. My initial test of 156-158 were not lies.
b) I only took 14 practice tests.
c) I only took one full test in all of my practice sessions.


Umm, my scores were not that bad, i don't know why i felt it was necessary to lie.  No matter what i do in my life, ive always exaggerated.  Even last semester, I told my g/f i got 2 A's and 3 a's.  I got an A and 4 a's.  WTF do i lie even about negligible *&^% like that?  I have no clue.  I really don't.  I even lie about my test results.  I told her on my last exam i got 104% (due to a bonus mark).  I didn't even get the test back.  I only got 88% (still top 5 in class, but still, wtf type of glue am i on)

My lsat score?  158.  I completely tanked it.  7,4,7,9 wrong respectively. 74/100.  why did i lie?  I guess i felt i had a better grasp of the test than i did.   My GPA is 3.7, not 3.8.  Honestly...I think i told mostly the truth after that, but i lie so god damn much i have trouble keeping track of what is a lie and what is truth.  I set up some sort of schema for truth for a forum site like this and im very good at remembering it, but try to separate it? Geez, that isn't easy.

Wow, i'm a liar.  Yay.  You can flame away, it's cool.  I'm doing this for myself, and a lot of other things i've done today.  from the pm's ive received, im glad i have been able to help a couple other people.  Maybe this is the epiphany i needed to clean up my life. 

So ya, be nasty or kind, it doesn't matter to me.  I'm usually pretty harsh on people though...but copying me is not exactly the hallmark of a class response heh.  Of note though:

Franz, draino, casa, aaron, baff, lobe, a couple girls who's name are escaping me, im sorry for lying.  I feel bad for lying to you.

If you ask "why would you lie?"  I think its pretty simple...though there may be more to it.  I like to give advice and feel important and having bad scores doesn't exactly lend credibility to what you say.  I just am not very fast at these types of questions...I think im decent at analyzing them after the fact.  Well, what have you, sorry for being an ass.  (and plz no pop psychology like i accused other people of lying because i lie myself, i really don't find that to hold any merit)  I have to study for december now, for i really do need a 166 to make sure i get into law school.  Bleh this is really humbling and sucks, any notes of not complete hatred will do wonders.

Flame away,

Matt


576
Studying for the LSAT / Re: December retake studying
« on: October 23, 2004, 05:38:01 PM »
Hmm, difference is 171 is a low score for Franz.

171 is more median for you lobe.  I think he is less at risk.  Depends if he has class or not heh.

Matt

577
I really sucked ass at games, but I think i know why...i just have trouble with game 4.  There are so few deductions, and you needed to work with some game inferences to finish the first list question.

I simply was not prepared for that.  Im used to answering list questions from the initial stimulus.  Not from future deductions.  That really sucks.  And question 22 really sucks ass.   Is there an easier way to do this question? 

Matt

578
Studying for the LSAT / Re: the first thing i found out this morning....
« on: October 23, 2004, 03:09:00 PM »
Harvard + 177, equals very good at columbia.  Forget the scale...I'd say you are 90% for columbia.

Matt

579
Studying for the LSAT / Re: post your score here
« on: October 23, 2004, 03:06:30 PM »
From your previous posts of how many you thought i was guessing you'd get 169.   That curve was the sucketh.  Haha!

Matt

580
Studying for the LSAT / Re: omg, superiorlobe has vanished! lol
« on: October 23, 2004, 03:04:40 PM »
Haha, never delete your account just for fun to see what happens haha

Matt

Pages: 1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 [58]