21
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Just have a question about today's test(2005 June) Serious~~
« on: June 06, 2005, 06:38:30 PM »
anyone remember if there were a lot or any d's on the science reading comp passage?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
21
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Just have a question about today's test(2005 June) Serious~~« on: June 06, 2005, 06:38:30 PM »
anyone remember if there were a lot or any d's on the science reading comp passage?
22
Studying for the LSAT / Re: 100 questions???« on: June 06, 2005, 06:36:36 PM »
i messed up the tapes game too. what was the deduction we must have all been missing?
also.. i generally do well on games too.. perhaps the fact that this weird game was on there will be reflected in the scaling.. wait to see how others did on the game to determine whether you should cancel. 23
Studying for the LSAT / Re: The unofficial "Which f-in section was the experimental on the June 05?" thread« on: June 06, 2005, 06:25:26 PM »
it must be 2.. the games experimental section guy solves the problem
24
Studying for the LSAT / Re: The unofficial "Which f-in section was the experimental on the June 05?" thread« on: June 06, 2005, 06:22:58 PM »
LR
LR Reading LG LR experimental section is always in the same position 25
Studying for the LSAT / Re: June 2004-- Logical Reasoning Question« on: May 30, 2005, 09:42:21 PM »
First off, the most helpful indicator is that the stimulus is a "good argument."
If you switch the stimulus around in an order you're more likely familar with, it reads like the following: No good things ever cause harm. Wealth often causes harm; therefore, wealth is not a good thing. As you can tell reading it that way, that's a good argument. If you switch answer choice "D" around, it reads like this: Most dachsounds hunt poorly. Sarah's dog hunts very well; therefore Sarah's dog is not a daschound. This is obviously a bad argument because Sarah's dog could be one of the few dachsounds that does not hunt poorly or even one that hunts very very well. 26
Law School Applications / Re: Which schools consider a June LSAT for Fall 2005 admissions?« on: May 28, 2005, 05:19:51 PM »
I know Akron law does. A good rule of thumb is that the shittier the school, the more likely it is to accept a June lsat. The second rule of thumb is, the higher the score you get, the more likely they are to accept an application with a June LSAT. It's a numbers game, and most schools will bend their "rules" for the appropriate numbers. Expect your numbers would need to be well above their average if you want serious consideration.
27
Studying for the LSAT / Re: Powerscore students- how long do you have access to the student center online?« on: October 06, 2004, 11:43:15 PM »
I took testmasters, and from what i know powerscore is the what testmasters calls itself in texas, and maybe other places... if so then you have several books that say "killer games" to answer your earlier posting, and about as far as testmasters goes... you have 3 years to use the internet stuff
|