Law School Discussion

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - ELB25

Pages: 1 [2] 3
i see the point... that if they flew at the same altitudes, disaster would ensue, however... the airplanes flying at different altitudes is saying that a nonunified policy had to be implemented to prevent disaster whereas the uniform one is saying they all dress alike to prevent "disaster" i guess in teh restaurant.  Neither of the answer choices pointed out as to why they had to implement the policies, you had to just assume it was to prevent disaster.  obviously, i coudl be wrong about this, and i think your points are convincing.

legal passage.  i don't think the analogous answer was correctly the airplane one.  the reason why i don't think so is because it says that airplanes are assigned different altitudes to fly whereas car drivers are all assigned one lane to drive in.  Therefore, i picked the waiters all needing to wear a uniform.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: June 05 RC Stone Hard
« on: June 06, 2005, 07:37:12 PM »
I'm even more convinced of my tortoise response because
1. JOB-testmasters teaches that generally the answer that parallels subject matter is incorrect. -the only thing that was similar with the JOB answer was the subject matter, not the logic behind it.
2. tortoise one sucked, but it was the same logic in that at first you think there's a hurdle, a potentially crippling one, but it/she overcomes and wins the race
3. raging thunderstorm... in literary terminology, that's a personfification.. there was no personfification between stone/bread, etc

I'm definitely uncertain as to what the correct answer is, but I chose the tortoise bc slow to win, but in the end will win... at first you don't think she'll succeed, but in the end she does.  I rejected the JOB one almost immediately because "same subject matter" is generally incorrect in a parallel question.  It's generally the sucker answer.

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Please post: June 05 LSAT LR questions
« on: June 06, 2005, 06:56:39 PM »
I thought the law passage was incredibly hard as well.  I wish I had decided to do the science before it.  damnit.  Also, so what's the consensus on the tortoise parallel the flaw question?

Studying for the LSAT / Re: Please post: June 05 LSAT LR questions
« on: June 06, 2005, 06:49:08 PM »
i'm pretty certain that the scientist answer was that it was attacking his character and not his scientific findings

Studying for the LSAT / Re: LR money doesn't exist
« on: June 06, 2005, 06:44:26 PM »

Studying for the LSAT / Re: June 05 Logic games thread
« on: June 06, 2005, 06:27:05 PM »

thanks george.. you're right about the reporter.  i definitely remember getting rid of that answer for that reason; i don't rememmber what choice that left me with, but i remember not being completely satisfied with it.

anyone remember if there were a lot or any d's on the science reading comp passage?

Pages: 1 [2] 3